Colorado · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 · time TBA · Nippert Stadium
Cincinnati · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CIN pass rush3.5% 11698th8.0% 20185thfaces COLO6.6% 10690th5.0% ~1.7 sacks
COLO pass rush5.6% 8957th15.7% 1983rdfaces CIN5.3% 7671st5.4% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

COLO with the ball

COLO offence vs CIN defenceCOLO offenceCIN defencerank gap
points added per play0.059104th0.10288th-16
success rate0.398110th0.41587th-23
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20285th1.20560th-25
rush: points added per play-0.019119th0.113102nd-17
rush: success rate0.404101st0.482129th+28
rush: explosiveness0.852100th0.82833rd-67
pass: points added per play0.113106th0.22093rd-13
pass: success rate0.386104th0.37851st-53
pass: explosiveness1.60654th1.56575th+21
standard downs: success rate0.439119th0.46280th-39
passing downs: success rate0.31270th0.318105th+35
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13368th3.217115th+47
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14441st0.17944th+3
short-yardage conversion rate0.619117th0.66745th-72
points per trip inside the 402.217134th3.947108th-26
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.184126th0.16374th-52
havoc allowed by the front seven0.122127th0.10784th-43
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06185th0.05654th-31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10014th——

CIN with the ball

CIN offence vs COLO defenceCIN offenceCOLO defencerank gap
points added per play0.36311th0.00754th+43
success rate0.49627th0.38261st+34
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30535th1.20762nd+27
rush: points added per play0.3614th-0.13520th+16
rush: success rate0.49726th0.41075th+49
rush: explosiveness1.2248th0.67512th+4
pass: points added per play0.38534th0.22594th+60
pass: success rate0.50926th0.36539th+13
pass: explosiveness1.432105th1.830127th+22
standard downs: success rate0.56017th0.41542nd+25
passing downs: success rate0.33853rd0.320107th+54
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.67711th2.37023rd+12
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13226th0.317136th+110
short-yardage conversion rate0.83322nd0.64739th+17
points per trip inside the 405.2008th2.93544th+36
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10720th0.201118th+98
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09688th0.138123rd+35
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0112nd0.06478th+76
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.20095th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.