West Virginia · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 · time TBA · Jones AT&T Stadium
Texas Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TTU pass rush4.5% 13280th9.2% 20758thfaces WVU10.2% 59129th7.4% ~2.4 sacks
WVU pass rush5.1% 9970th7.6% 19692ndfaces TTU5.5% 9178th5.3% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WVU with the ball

WVU offence vs TTU defenceWVU offenceTTU defencerank gap
points added per play0.18462nd0.00352nd-10
success rate0.44960th0.35334th-26
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20583rd1.376117th+34
rush: points added per play0.15258th0.03872nd+14
rush: success rate0.46852nd0.35940th-12
rush: explosiveness0.93678th0.96987th+9
pass: points added per play0.30755th0.01933rd-22
pass: success rate0.40099th0.36338th-61
pass: explosiveness2.2261st1.62494th+93
standard downs: success rate0.49173rd0.37415th-58
passing downs: success rate0.32960th0.31298th+38
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.24750th2.96290th+40
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13533rd0.19471st+38
short-yardage conversion rate0.72088th0.66751st-37
points per trip inside the 404.03464th2.57120th-44
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11126th0.183103rd+77
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07849th0.10176th+27
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03420th0.083121st+101
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60068th——

TTU with the ball

TTU offence vs WVU defenceTTU offenceWVU defencerank gap
points added per play0.27232nd0.12496th+64
success rate0.50521st0.443108th+87
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.154104th1.18151st-53
rush: points added per play0.24227th-0.02546th+19
rush: success rate0.52412th0.39161st+49
rush: explosiveness0.851102nd0.84137th-65
pass: points added per play0.46722nd0.336117th+95
pass: success rate0.51722nd0.511134th+112
pass: explosiveness1.51379th1.44244th-35
standard downs: success rate0.54831st0.520125th+94
passing downs: success rate0.39720th0.26252nd+32
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28643rd2.90278th+35
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17785th0.20381st-4
short-yardage conversion rate0.77453rd0.70666th+13
points per trip inside the 404.59334th3.26963rd+29
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.177119th0.15455th-64
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09791st0.11498th+7
havoc allowed by the secondary0.079125th0.03916th-109
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80083rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.