Iowa State · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Arizona Stadium
Arizona · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ARIZ pass rush4.4% 11482nd8.8% 19268thfaces ISU2.6% 7816th3.5% ~1.1 sacks
ISU pass rush1.3% 80132nd8.8% 17069thfaces ARIZ8.8% 113120th5.0% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ISU with the ball

ISU offence vs ARIZ defenceISU offenceARIZ defencerank gap
points added per play0.11787th0.00250th-37
success rate0.382119th0.35231st-88
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.33425th1.415127th+102
rush: points added per play0.10576th0.01865th-11
rush: success rate0.387114th0.34733rd-81
rush: explosiveness1.19110th1.072110th+100
pass: points added per play0.20578th0.05346th-32
pass: success rate0.40296th0.35630th-66
pass: explosiveness1.54670th1.60191st+21
standard downs: success rate0.421127th0.40332nd-95
passing downs: success rate0.29986th0.27764th-22
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99390th2.58942nd-48
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19092nd0.253125th+33
short-yardage conversion rate0.583122nd1.000137th+15
points per trip inside the 404.63629th2.82435th+6
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170109th0.16878th-31
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08357th0.10888th+31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.087133rd0.06064th-69
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10060th——

ARIZ with the ball

ARIZ offence vs ISU defenceARIZ offenceISU defencerank gap
points added per play0.21356th-0.03835th-21
success rate0.50022nd0.37051st+29
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151106th1.09325th-81
rush: points added per play0.14762nd-0.08231st-31
rush: success rate0.52114th0.37449th+35
rush: explosiveness0.696132nd0.86444th-88
pass: points added per play0.28161st0.06952nd-9
pass: success rate0.49333rd0.36234th+1
pass: explosiveness1.51080th1.43941st-39
standard downs: success rate0.53635th0.46785th+50
passing downs: success rate0.41911th0.1581st-10
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.53417th2.57640th+23
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11812th0.19875th+63
short-yardage conversion rate0.85014th0.70059th+45
points per trip inside the 404.32146th2.0486th-40
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11430th0.17786th+56
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07544th0.128115th+71
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03930th0.04938th+8
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20056th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.