The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| BAY pass rush | 7.7% 13027th | 14.7% 2315th | faces TCU | 6.7% 10593rd | 7.2% ~2.4 sacks |
| TCU pass rush | 7.8% 7724th | 6.8% 161111th | faces BAY | 3.3% 12037th | 5.6% ~1.8 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
TCU with the ball
| TCU offence vs BAY defence | TCU offence | BAY defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.17464th | -0.11516th | -48 |
| success rate | 0.46251st | 0.32112th | -39 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.24062nd | 1.13938th | -24 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.030104th | -0.2575th | -99 |
| rush: success rate | 0.47051st | 0.2808th | -43 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.771120th | 0.97088th | -32 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.31953rd | -0.02525th | -28 |
| pass: success rate | 0.46452nd | 0.34423rd | -29 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.66441st | 1.2849th | -32 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.5739th | 0.3619th | 0 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.218130th | 0.25243rd | -87 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.03084th | 2.50331st | -53 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16463rd | 0.264129th | +66 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.84219th | 0.4004th | -15 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.43399th | 1.9585th | -94 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.13359th | 0.214127th | +68 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.104106th | 0.138122nd | +16 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.02912th | 0.076105th | +93 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 67.500113th | — | — |
BAY with the ball
| BAY offence vs TCU defence | BAY offence | TCU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.09298th | -0.12114th | -84 |
| success rate | 0.401104th | 0.36847th | -57 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.26355th | 0.9251st | -54 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.05590th | -0.2863rd | -87 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44475th | 0.31617th | -58 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.86297th | 0.4614th | -93 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.17787th | 0.07254th | -33 |
| pass: success rate | 0.373113th | 0.41785th | -28 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.75623rd | 1.35921st | -2 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.449109th | 0.40835th | -74 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.29888th | 0.28272nd | -16 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.93895th | 2.54435th | -60 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16973rd | 0.21190th | +17 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.73777th | 0.56215th | -62 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.393100th | 3.00049th | -51 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.167102nd | 0.17994th | -8 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.103102nd | 0.117105th | +3 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06492nd | 0.06377th | -15 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 64.200133rd | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.