Houston · away
at
Final HOU 26 – 28 TTU
Friday 2026-09-18 20:00 · Jones AT&T Stadium
Texas Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TTU pass rush4.5% 13280th9.2% 20758thfaces HOU3.2% 9432nd3.9% ~1.3 sacks
HOU pass rush5.7% 12253rd7.1% 197103rdfaces TTU5.5% 9178th5.6% ~1.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

HOU with the ball

HOU offence vs TTU defenceHOU offenceTTU defencerank gap
points added per play0.4393rd0.00352nd+49
success rate0.5792nd0.35334th+32
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.123118th1.376117th-1
rush: points added per play0.30713th0.03872nd+59
rush: success rate0.5782nd0.35940th+38
rush: explosiveness0.796112th0.96987th-25
pass: points added per play0.6395th0.01933rd+28
pass: success rate0.5933rd0.36338th+35
pass: explosiveness1.58063rd1.62494th+31
standard downs: success rate0.5817th0.37415th+8
passing downs: success rate0.5691st0.31298th+97
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9043rd2.96290th+87
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0995th0.19471st+66
short-yardage conversion rate0.85713th0.66751st+38
points per trip inside the 405.12911th2.57120th+9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10015th0.183103rd+88
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05716th0.10176th+60
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04345th0.083121st+76
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.300129th——

TTU with the ball

TTU offence vs HOU defenceTTU offenceHOU defencerank gap
points added per play0.27232nd0.09985th+53
success rate0.50521st0.39470th+49
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.154104th1.360112th+8
rush: points added per play0.24227th-0.09528th+1
rush: success rate0.52412th0.34734th+22
rush: explosiveness0.851102nd0.83935th-67
pass: points added per play0.46722nd0.303112th+90
pass: success rate0.51722nd0.443106th+84
pass: explosiveness1.51379th1.651101st+22
standard downs: success rate0.54831st0.45173rd+42
passing downs: success rate0.39720th0.28068th+48
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28643rd2.31815th-28
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17785th0.21494th+9
short-yardage conversion rate0.77453rd0.64338th-15
points per trip inside the 404.59334th4.812130th+96
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.177119th0.211126th+7
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09791st0.09868th-23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.079125th0.114137th+12
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80083rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.