Bowling Green · away
at
Final BGSU 7 – 55 ISU
Saturday 2026-09-19 12:00 · Jack Trice Stadium
Iowa State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ISU pass rush1.3% 80132nd8.8% 17069thfaces BGSU4.3% 7056th2.8% ~0.9 sacks
BGSU pass rush9.2% 6517th10.7% 17831stfaces ISU2.6% 7816th5.9% ~1.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BGSU with the ball

BGSU offence vs ISU defenceBGSU offenceISU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.115136th-0.03835th-101
success rate0.336135th0.37051st-84
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.958138th1.09325th-113
rush: points added per play-0.261138th-0.08231st-107
rush: success rate0.302138th0.37449th-89
rush: explosiveness0.577136th0.86444th-92
pass: points added per play0.059111th0.06952nd-59
pass: success rate0.364119th0.36234th-85
pass: explosiveness1.447101st1.43941st-60
standard downs: success rate0.431124th0.46785th-39
passing downs: success rate0.152137th0.1581st-136
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431135th2.57640th-95
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.246133rd0.19875th-58
short-yardage conversion rate0.72780th0.70059th-21
points per trip inside the 401.188138th2.0486th-132
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.194129th0.17786th-43
havoc allowed by the front seven0.138135th0.128115th-20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05676th0.04938th-38
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.30053rd——

ISU with the ball

ISU offence vs BGSU defenceISU offenceBGSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.11787th0.227127th+40
success rate0.382119th0.492135th+16
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.33425th1.29493rd+68
rush: points added per play0.10576th0.251132nd+56
rush: success rate0.387114th0.520137th+23
rush: explosiveness1.19110th1.216133rd+123
pass: points added per play0.20578th0.277106th+28
pass: success rate0.40296th0.477122nd+26
pass: explosiveness1.54670th1.43839th-31
standard downs: success rate0.421127th0.556136th+9
passing downs: success rate0.29986th0.30694th+8
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99390th3.436133rd+43
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19092nd0.16936th-56
short-yardage conversion rate0.583122nd0.73981st-41
points per trip inside the 404.63629th4.231121st+92
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170109th0.12013th-96
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08357th0.09156th-1
havoc allowed by the secondary0.087133rd0.0292nd-131
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10060th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.