Miami (OH) · away
at
Final M-OH 31 – 35 CIN
Saturday 2026-09-19 15:30 · TQL Stadium
Cincinnati · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CIN pass rush3.5% 11698th8.0% 20185thfaces M-OH4.0% 10148th3.7% ~1.2 sacks
M-OH pass rush3.3% 123103rd4.8% 209137thfaces CIN5.3% 7671st4.3% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

M-OH with the ball

M-OH offence vs CIN defenceM-OH offenceCIN defencerank gap
points added per play0.23943rd0.10288th+45
success rate0.43082nd0.41587th+5
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42612th1.20560th+48
rush: points added per play0.017111th0.113102nd-9
rush: success rate0.389111th0.482129th+18
rush: explosiveness0.87792nd0.82833rd-59
pass: points added per play0.6196th0.22093rd+87
pass: success rate0.48737th0.37851st+14
pass: explosiveness1.86711th1.56575th+64
standard downs: success rate0.48874th0.46280th+6
passing downs: success rate0.30183rd0.318105th+22
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.871100th3.217115th+15
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212116th0.17944th-72
short-yardage conversion rate0.667104th0.66745th-59
points per trip inside the 403.90970th3.947108th+38
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14979th0.16374th-5
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111115th0.10784th-31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03824th0.05654th+30
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.00063rd——

CIN with the ball

CIN offence vs M-OH defenceCIN offenceM-OH defencerank gap
points added per play0.36311th0.179116th+105
success rate0.49627th0.450115th+88
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30535th1.316102nd+67
rush: points added per play0.3614th0.06583rd+79
rush: success rate0.49726th0.42586th+60
rush: explosiveness1.2248th0.98591st+83
pass: points added per play0.38534th0.372123rd+89
pass: success rate0.50926th0.483125th+99
pass: explosiveness1.432105th1.52962nd-43
standard downs: success rate0.56017th0.509117th+100
passing downs: success rate0.33853rd0.341116th+63
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.67711th2.86069th+58
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13226th0.21798th+72
short-yardage conversion rate0.83322nd0.778101st+79
points per trip inside the 405.2008th4.700129th+121
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10720th0.1042nd-18
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09688th0.0659th-79
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0112nd0.03813th+11
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.20095th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.