Northern Illinois · away
at
Final NIU 17 – 42 ARIZ
Saturday 2026-09-19 22:30 · Arizona Stadium
Arizona · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ARIZ pass rush4.4% 11482nd8.8% 19268thfaces NIU10.7% 122133rd7.5% ~2.5 sacks
NIU pass rush3.9% 10292nd9.6% 19848thfaces ARIZ8.8% 113120th6.4% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

NIU with the ball

NIU offence vs ARIZ defenceNIU offenceARIZ defencerank gap
points added per play-0.121137th0.00250th-87
success rate0.362127th0.35231st-96
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19090th1.415127th+37
rush: points added per play-0.112134th0.01865th-69
rush: success rate0.381117th0.34733rd-84
rush: explosiveness0.87793rd1.072110th+17
pass: points added per play0.007122nd0.05346th-76
pass: success rate0.366118th0.35630th-88
pass: explosiveness1.414108th1.60191st-17
standard downs: success rate0.442114th0.40332nd-82
passing downs: success rate0.215131st0.27764th-67
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.560130th2.58942nd-88
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.210113th0.253125th+12
short-yardage conversion rate0.76558th1.000137th+79
points per trip inside the 401.545137th2.82435th-102
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.177118th0.16878th-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.132132nd0.10888th-44
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04551st0.06064th+13
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.30043rd——

ARIZ with the ball

ARIZ offence vs NIU defenceARIZ offenceNIU defencerank gap
points added per play0.21356th0.159109th+53
success rate0.50022nd0.444111th+89
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151106th1.323106th0
rush: points added per play0.14762nd0.11098th+36
rush: success rate0.52114th0.41176th+62
rush: explosiveness0.696132nd1.076113th-19
pass: points added per play0.28161st0.26099th+38
pass: success rate0.49333rd0.492128th+95
pass: explosiveness1.51080th1.48955th-25
standard downs: success rate0.53635th0.47892nd+57
passing downs: success rate0.41911th0.372130th+119
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.53417th2.90277th+60
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11812th0.20279th+67
short-yardage conversion rate0.85014th0.57919th+5
points per trip inside the 404.32146th3.73196th+50
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11430th0.12719th-11
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07544th0.08647th+3
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03930th0.04119th-11
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20056th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.