UCF · away
at
Final UCF 7 – 12 PITT
Saturday 2026-09-12 15:30 · Acrisure Stadium
Pittsburgh · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
PITT pass rush5.6% 10758th11.2% 17924thfaces UCF4.2% 7153rd4.9% ~1.6 sacks
UCF pass rush5.7% 12354th10.1% 21940thfaces PITT4.0% 10147th4.8% ~1.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UCF with the ball

UCF offence vs PITT defenceUCF offencePITT defencerank gap
points added per play0.11985th-0.10718th-67
success rate0.43676th0.2872nd-74
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20681st1.379119th+38
rush: points added per play0.18046th-0.17812th-34
rush: success rate0.44574th0.2787th-67
rush: explosiveness1.16512th0.99592nd+80
pass: points added per play0.053113th-0.01228th-85
pass: success rate0.42679th0.30611th-68
pass: explosiveness1.278130th1.62093rd-37
standard downs: success rate0.49467th0.3456th-61
passing downs: success rate0.29987th0.20010th-77
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.05280th1.7772nd-78
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17278th0.320137th+59
short-yardage conversion rate0.80041st0.53812th-29
points per trip inside the 404.76921st1.6883rd-18
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13765th0.17992nd+27
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09792nd0.117104th+12
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04034th0.06375th+41
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.200136th——

PITT with the ball

PITT offence vs UCF defencePITT offenceUCF defencerank gap
points added per play0.29425th-0.04732nd+7
success rate0.49726th0.34325th-1
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24960th1.27591st+31
rush: points added per play0.07886th-0.11923rd-63
rush: success rate0.46062nd0.30714th-48
rush: explosiveness0.809111th0.87250th-61
pass: points added per play0.50716th0.07756th+40
pass: success rate0.53014th0.38560th+46
pass: explosiveness1.59558th1.59587th+29
standard downs: success rate0.52840th0.40031st-9
passing downs: success rate0.41213th0.24839th+26
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.30939th2.29113th-26
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18288th0.241114th+26
short-yardage conversion rate0.632115th0.62534th-81
points per trip inside the 404.23355th2.30414th-41
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09613th0.17382nd+69
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05820th0.11192nd+72
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03827th0.06273rd+46
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40073rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.