Texas Tech · away
at
Final TTU 35 – 24 ORST
Saturday 2026-09-12 19:30 · Reser Stadium
Oregon State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ORST pass rush12.6% 954th10.6% 20832ndfaces TTU5.5% 9178th9.1% ~3.0 sacks
TTU pass rush4.5% 13280th9.2% 20758thfaces ORST4.3% 14055th4.4% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TTU with the ball

TTU offence vs ORST defenceTTU offenceORST defencerank gap
points added per play0.27232nd0.09282nd+50
success rate0.50521st0.41386th+65
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.154104th1.09326th-78
rush: points added per play0.24227th0.02669th+42
rush: success rate0.52412th0.39763rd+51
rush: explosiveness0.851102nd0.76424th-78
pass: points added per play0.46722nd0.17280th+58
pass: success rate0.51722nd0.439104th+82
pass: explosiveness1.51379th1.39629th-50
standard downs: success rate0.54831st0.46986th+55
passing downs: success rate0.39720th0.30290th+70
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28643rd3.042101st+58
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17785th0.13515th-70
short-yardage conversion rate0.77453rd0.76292nd+39
points per trip inside the 404.59334th3.30864th+30
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.177119th0.16777th-42
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09791st0.09766th-25
havoc allowed by the secondary0.079125th0.06994th-31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80083rd——

ORST with the ball

ORST offence vs TTU defenceORST offenceTTU defencerank gap
points added per play0.25537th0.00352nd+15
success rate0.42587th0.35334th-53
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4556th1.376117th+111
rush: points added per play0.037101st0.03872nd-29
rush: success rate0.387115th0.35940th-75
rush: explosiveness0.795115th0.96987th-28
pass: points added per play0.36939th0.01933rd-6
pass: success rate0.44963rd0.36338th-25
pass: explosiveness1.75425th1.62494th+69
standard downs: success rate0.48676th0.37415th-61
passing downs: success rate0.30478th0.31298th+20
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.19859th2.96290th+31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.1089th0.19471st+62
short-yardage conversion rate0.77852nd0.66751st-1
points per trip inside the 404.59333rd2.57120th-13
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13252nd0.183103rd+51
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05112th0.10176th+64
havoc allowed by the secondary0.081126th0.083121st-5
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.80011th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.