Boston College · away
at
Final BC 15 – 34 CIN
Saturday 2026-09-05 15:30 · Nippert Stadium
Cincinnati · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CIN pass rush3.5% 11698th8.0% 20185thfaces BC7.5% 93104th5.5% ~1.8 sacks
BC pass rush7.2% 8333rd10.8% 20428thfaces CIN5.3% 7671st6.2% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BC with the ball

BC offence vs CIN defenceBC offenceCIN defencerank gap
points added per play-0.032127th0.10288th-39
success rate0.389115th0.41587th-28
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.164101st1.20560th-41
rush: points added per play-0.006115th0.113102nd-13
rush: success rate0.43981st0.482129th+48
rush: explosiveness0.93579th0.82833rd-46
pass: points added per play0.063110th0.22093rd-17
pass: success rate0.357126th0.37851st-75
pass: explosiveness1.53374th1.56575th+1
standard downs: success rate0.46099th0.46280th-19
passing downs: success rate0.244116th0.318105th-11
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.847103rd3.217115th+12
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252134th0.17944th-90
short-yardage conversion rate0.68898th0.66745th-53
points per trip inside the 403.091118th3.947108th-10
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.179120th0.16374th-46
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111112th0.10784th-28
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069107th0.05654th-53
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20058th——

CIN with the ball

CIN offence vs BC defenceCIN offenceBC defencerank gap
points added per play0.36311th0.00251st+40
success rate0.49627th0.39571st+44
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30535th1.23775th+40
rush: points added per play0.3614th0.00761st+57
rush: success rate0.49726th0.39059th+33
rush: explosiveness1.2248th1.030101st+93
pass: points added per play0.38534th0.15576th+42
pass: success rate0.50926th0.42292nd+66
pass: explosiveness1.432105th1.49256th-49
standard downs: success rate0.56017th0.39827th+10
passing downs: success rate0.33853rd0.388133rd+80
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.67711th3.01696th+85
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13226th0.19572nd+46
short-yardage conversion rate0.83322nd0.65041st+19
points per trip inside the 405.2008th3.39169th+61
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10720th0.17483rd+63
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09688th0.120107th+19
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0112nd0.05448th+46
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.20095th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.