LSU · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 · time TBA · Neyland Stadium
Tennessee · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TENN pass rush11.7% 1036th10.7% 18729thfaces LSU5.1% 13767th8.4% ~2.8 sacks
LSU pass rush12.7% 1343rd15.2% 2304thfaces TENN10.2% 88131st11.5% ~3.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

LSU with the ball

LSU offence vs TENN defenceLSU offenceTENN defencerank gap
points added per play0.23648th-0.08622nd-26
success rate0.47840th0.35839th-1
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.28247th1.06418th-29
rush: points added per play0.17449th0.08190th+41
rush: success rate0.46061st0.36542nd-19
rush: explosiveness0.95873rd1.02699th+26
pass: points added per play0.34547th-0.1446th-41
pass: success rate0.48935th0.37955th+20
pass: explosiveness1.71830th1.0951st-29
standard downs: success rate0.50951st0.40634th-17
passing downs: success rate0.39818th0.27258th+40
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.05279th3.03199th+20
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14844th0.19164th+20
short-yardage conversion rate0.72086th0.75088th+2
points per trip inside the 404.06161st2.22711th-50
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.167103rd0.218129th+26
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08871st0.148129th+58
havoc allowed by the secondary0.079124th0.07097th-27
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.400128th——

TENN with the ball

TENN offence vs LSU defenceTENN offenceLSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.22452nd-0.1664th-48
success rate0.45654th0.3035th-49
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20878th1.18453rd-25
rush: points added per play0.31112th-0.15516th+4
rush: success rate0.48537th0.33028th-9
rush: explosiveness1.11320th0.72720th0
pass: points added per play0.17290th-0.1802nd-88
pass: success rate0.43176th0.2814th-72
pass: explosiveness1.361119th1.56374th-45
standard downs: success rate0.51745th0.3547th-38
passing downs: success rate0.30084th0.22724th-60
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.54016th2.2009th-7
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13836th0.240113th+77
short-yardage conversion rate0.83324th0.778100th+76
points per trip inside the 405.3085th3.857104th+99
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14373rd0.224131st+58
havoc allowed by the front seven0.101101st0.154130th+29
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04241st0.07198th+57
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60067th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.