Texas · neutral site
vs
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 15:30 · Cotton Bowl
Oklahoma · neutral site
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
OU pass rush14.0% 932nd12.8% 21913thfaces TEX7.5% 133103rd10.8% ~3.5 sacks
TEX pass rush9.4% 12815th12.8% 25012thfaces OU6.0% 11787th7.7% ~2.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TEX with the ball

TEX offence vs OU defenceTEX offenceOU defencerank gap
points added per play0.11090th-0.1822nd-88
success rate0.45556th0.3046th-50
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143112th1.23574th-38
rush: points added per play0.04795th-0.10427th-68
rush: success rate0.45865th0.28710th-55
rush: explosiveness0.790117th1.171129th+12
pass: points added per play0.28063rd-0.1624th-59
pass: success rate0.46254th0.33722nd-32
pass: explosiveness1.56266th1.32216th-50
standard downs: success rate0.50062nd0.3334th-58
passing downs: success rate0.36239th0.24737th-2
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.818109th2.36420th-89
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18390th0.19470th-20
short-yardage conversion rate0.75071st0.58321st-50
points per trip inside the 404.25054th2.0838th-46
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.171111th0.216128th+17
havoc allowed by the front seven0.130131st0.145128th-3
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04137th0.07096th+59
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.900111th——

OU with the ball

OU offence vs TEX defenceOU offenceTEX defencerank gap
points added per play-0.045129th-0.05629th-100
success rate0.392113th0.35029th-84
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.112123rd1.09427th-96
rush: points added per play-0.260137th-0.07433rd-104
rush: success rate0.362125th0.36543rd-82
rush: explosiveness0.542138th0.79126th-112
pass: points added per play0.29358th-0.03322nd-36
pass: success rate0.43175th0.33118th-57
pass: explosiveness1.71431st1.43236th+5
standard downs: success rate0.432123rd0.39726th-97
passing downs: success rate0.30477th0.24738th-39
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.603126th2.55437th-89
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.223124th0.19876th-48
short-yardage conversion rate0.462136th0.73378th-58
points per trip inside the 403.389102nd2.19010th-92
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15789th0.206124th+35
havoc allowed by the front seven0.118123rd0.141126th+3
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03933rd0.06584th+51
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.40042nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.