Arizona State · away
at
Final ASU 20 – 48 TA&M
Saturday 2026-09-12 12:00 · Kyle Field
Texas A&M · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TA&M pass rush3.1% 97104th8.8% 21671stfaces ASU3.6% 5639th3.3% ~1.1 sacks
ASU pass rush4.9% 6173rd10.7% 13130thfaces TA&M5.5% 14579th5.2% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ASU with the ball

ASU offence vs TA&M defenceASU offenceTA&M defencerank gap
points added per play0.058105th0.03368th-37
success rate0.41697th0.38562nd-35
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39618th1.30798th+80
rush: points added per play0.018110th-0.07932nd-78
rush: success rate0.396107th0.36644th-63
rush: explosiveness1.05037th0.84136th-1
pass: points added per play0.18685th0.21892nd+7
pass: success rate0.44765th0.40877th+12
pass: explosiveness1.74327th1.851130th+103
standard downs: success rate0.46397th0.42651st-46
passing downs: success rate0.31867th0.28170th+3
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.690122nd2.76459th-63
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.198101st0.17945th-56
short-yardage conversion rate0.77850th0.71469th+19
points per trip inside the 403.60088th3.05354th-34
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16396th0.17787th-9
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104104th0.115100th-4
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05981st0.06271st-10
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.000109th——

TA&M with the ball

TA&M offence vs ASU defenceTA&M offenceASU defencerank gap
points added per play0.043111th0.02363rd-48
success rate0.44367th0.37050th-17
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.074131st1.17949th-82
rush: points added per play0.09481st-0.02645th-36
rush: success rate0.49728th0.39462nd+34
rush: explosiveness0.820110th0.83834th-76
pass: points added per play0.022119th0.09660th-59
pass: success rate0.385107th0.33721st-86
pass: explosiveness1.405112th1.60090th-22
standard downs: success rate0.47886th0.45172nd-14
passing downs: success rate0.36634th0.22422nd-12
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21657th2.90781st+24
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16665th0.14923rd-42
short-yardage conversion rate0.85015th0.63636th+21
points per trip inside the 404.36043rd2.68428th-15
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16193rd0.15964th-29
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07746th0.09055th+9
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084130th0.06992nd-38
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400116th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.