Southern Miss · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · S.B. Ballard Stadium
Old Dominion · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ODU pass rush5.4% 11262nd10.9% 22926thfaces USM6.7% 12096th6.0% ~2.0 sacks
USM pass rush6.4% 9445th7.4% 23098thfaces ODU14.3% 91135th10.3% ~3.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

USM with the ball

USM offence vs ODU defenceUSM offenceODU defencerank gap
points added per play0.063103rd-0.01744th-59
success rate0.43083rd0.33921st-62
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.125117th1.24279th-38
rush: points added per play0.19040th-0.10625th-15
rush: success rate0.47050th0.31818th-32
rush: explosiveness0.824109th0.96385th-24
pass: points added per play0.000125th0.10261st-64
pass: success rate0.40893rd0.36133rd-60
pass: explosiveness1.440103rd1.57881st-22
standard downs: success rate0.49368th0.36813th-55
passing downs: success rate0.272105th0.28678th-27
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.58213th2.38924th+11
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0902nd0.223104th+102
short-yardage conversion rate0.84218th0.61930th+12
points per trip inside the 404.09159th3.33366th+7
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15790th0.16476th-14
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07032nd0.128116th+84
havoc allowed by the secondary0.087134th0.03711th-123
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.0009th——

ODU with the ball

ODU offence vs USM defenceODU offenceUSM defencerank gap
points added per play-0.100135th0.12394th-41
success rate0.310138th0.40681st-57
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4835th1.27390th+85
rush: points added per play-0.076126th0.189125th-1
rush: success rate0.331136th0.453109th-27
rush: explosiveness1.2984th1.039104th+100
pass: points added per play-0.137136th0.20988th-48
pass: success rate0.290136th0.36337th-99
pass: explosiveness1.67737th1.731117th+80
standard downs: success rate0.299138th0.42550th-88
passing downs: success rate0.32663rd0.363125th+62
line yards per rush (the O-line)1.613138th3.197114th-24
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.315138th0.18050th-88
short-yardage conversion rate0.300137th0.70665th-72
points per trip inside the 402.913124th2.96046th-78
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.243138th0.13129th-109
havoc allowed by the front seven0.205138th0.08749th-89
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03825th0.04429th+4
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10061st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.