Troy · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Hancock Whitney Stadium
South Alabama · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
USA pass rush5.9% 8549th8.0% 17686thfaces TROY3.6% 11043rd4.8% ~1.6 sacks
TROY pass rush5.1% 9969th13.1% 17611thfaces USA4.1% 9851st4.6% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TROY with the ball

TROY offence vs USA defenceTROY offenceUSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.023116th0.279132nd+16
success rate0.380120th0.486134th+14
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31333rd1.460133rd+100
rush: points added per play0.04796th0.349138th+42
rush: success rate0.395108th0.505134th+26
rush: explosiveness1.07427th1.380137th+110
pass: points added per play0.035116th0.21089th-27
pass: success rate0.367117th0.462113th-4
pass: explosiveness1.57165th1.56576th+11
standard downs: success rate0.426126th0.532131st+5
passing downs: success rate0.28497th0.367127th+30
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.673123rd3.230118th-5
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.238128th0.17442nd-86
short-yardage conversion rate0.632116th0.60025th-91
points per trip inside the 402.958121st4.077116th-5
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.202134th0.17993rd-41
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08975th0.11599th+24
havoc allowed by the secondary0.113138th0.06481st-57
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80020th——

USA with the ball

USA offence vs TROY defenceUSA offenceTROY defencerank gap
points added per play0.17463rd0.03669th+6
success rate0.41991st0.37253rd-38
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30238th1.318104th+66
rush: points added per play0.17747th-0.03544th-3
rush: success rate0.42590th0.36645th-45
rush: explosiveness1.06829th1.02398th+69
pass: points added per play0.20877th0.07555th-22
pass: success rate0.42185th0.37956th-29
pass: explosiveness1.63950th1.50461st+11
standard downs: success rate0.448111th0.44666th-45
passing downs: success rate0.35445th0.23533rd-12
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18262nd2.34419th-43
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12116th0.259127th+111
short-yardage conversion rate0.79244th0.60027th-17
points per trip inside the 404.29648th3.00050th+2
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14677th0.18298th+21
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08872nd0.124113th+41
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05880th0.05862nd-18
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30093rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.