Louisiana Tech · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · Hancock Whitney Stadium
South Alabama · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
USA pass rush5.9% 8549th8.0% 17686thfaces LT9.6% 73125th7.7% ~2.6 sacks
LT pass rush10.1% 6911th13.5% 1488thfaces USA4.1% 9851st7.1% ~2.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

LT with the ball

LT offence vs USA defenceLT offenceUSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.015118th0.279132nd+14
success rate0.337134th0.486134th0
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4437th1.460133rd+126
rush: points added per play-0.077127th0.349138th+11
rush: success rate0.320137th0.505134th-3
rush: explosiveness1.12717th1.380137th+120
pass: points added per play0.13996th0.21089th-7
pass: success rate0.359123rd0.462113th-10
pass: explosiveness1.79719th1.56576th+57
standard downs: success rate0.373135th0.532131st-4
passing downs: success rate0.269107th0.367127th+20
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.648124th3.230118th-6
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.227125th0.17442nd-83
short-yardage conversion rate0.500134th0.60025th-109
points per trip inside the 404.70024th4.077116th+92
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.181123rd0.17993rd-30
havoc allowed by the front seven0.114119th0.11599th-20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.067102nd0.06481st-21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)64.700132nd——

USA with the ball

USA offence vs LT defenceUSA offenceLT defencerank gap
points added per play0.17463rd-0.01245th-18
success rate0.41991st0.34728th-63
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30238th1.30596th+58
rush: points added per play0.17747th-0.01752nd+5
rush: success rate0.42590th0.32524th-66
rush: explosiveness1.06829th1.01896th+67
pass: points added per play0.20877th0.11967th-10
pass: success rate0.42185th0.38459th-26
pass: explosiveness1.63950th1.686107th+57
standard downs: success rate0.448111th0.41440th-71
passing downs: success rate0.35445th0.22826th-19
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18262nd2.0635th-57
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12116th0.230110th+94
short-yardage conversion rate0.79244th0.66748th+4
points per trip inside the 404.29648th3.72294th+46
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14677th0.242136th+59
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08872nd0.178136th+64
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05880th0.06480th0
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30093rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.