UL Monroe · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Veterans Memorial Stadium (AL)
Troy · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

ULMTROYbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence616Offence: points per play — defence250Offence: success rate — offence2613Offence: success rate — defence162Offence: explosiveness — offence1477Offence: explosiveness — defence5325Run game — offence3631Run game — defence169Pass game — offence316Pass game — defence1561Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence3411Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence687Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence203Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence9529

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsULM by 29TROY by 51

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). TROY wins about 76% of the time at a number like ours.

ULM

Games4
Plays per game67.8
Drives per game12.2
SP+-29.0 (138th, offence 131st, defence 138th)
Returning production39% (pass 78%, rush 16%, receiving 26%)

TROY

Games4
Plays per game73.0
Drives per game13.0
SP+-8.8 (104th, offence 112th, defence 84th)
Returning production35% (pass 103%, rush 136%, receiving 12%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceULMTROY
pass rate, all downs50%56th50%59th
pass rate, standard downs40%85th40%82nd
no-huddle share95%14th96%12th
pass rate, 1st down38%102nd42%77th
pass rate, passing downs75%16th69%43rd
pass rate, red zone44%43rd58%6th
seconds per play (own drives)27.985th29.364th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

ULM offence

ULM offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.052271130 of 138
success rate0.402271103 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119271119 of 138
rush: points added per play0.07027188 of 138
rush: success rate0.43227186 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87927190 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.082271134 of 138
pass: success rate0.386271106 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.406271111 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.455271105 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.275271102 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96827191 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15227152 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.571271125 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.478271131 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170271110 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10027197 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070271112 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90027133 of 138

TROY offence

TROY offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.023292116 of 138
success rate0.380292120 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31329233 of 138
rush: points added per play0.04729296 of 138
rush: success rate0.395292108 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.07429227 of 138
pass: points added per play0.035292116 of 138
pass: success rate0.367292117 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.57129265 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.426292126 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.28429297 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.673292123 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.238292128 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.632292116 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.958292121 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.202292134 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08929275 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.113292138 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80029220 of 138

ULM defence

ULM defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.308295135 of 138
success rate0.508295137 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21529566 of 138
rush: points added per play0.314295136 of 138
rush: success rate0.522295138 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.077295115 of 138
pass: points added per play0.339295118 of 138
pass: success rate0.500295130 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.41329534 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.536295133 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.427295136 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.418295130 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.16129532 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.778295102 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.448295125 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1152958 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0642958 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05129542 of 138
opponent average starting field position70.60029541 of 138

TROY defence

TROY defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.03624269 of 138
success rate0.37224253 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.318242104 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.03524244 of 138
rush: success rate0.36624245 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.02324298 of 138
pass: points added per play0.07524255 of 138
pass: success rate0.37924256 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.50424261 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.44624266 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.23524233 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.34424219 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.259242127 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.60024227 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.00024250 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.18224298 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.124242113 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05824262 of 138
opponent average starting field position68.30024221 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs