The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
ULM
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 67.8 |
| Drives per game | 12.2 |
| SP+ | -29.0 (138th, offence 131st, defence 138th) |
| Returning production | 39% (pass 78%, rush 16%, receiving 26%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | ULM |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 50%56th |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 40%85th |
| no-huddle share | — | 95%14th |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 38%102nd |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 75%16th |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 44%43rd |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 27.985th |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
ULM offence
| ULM offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.052 | 271 | 130 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.402 | 271 | 103 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.119 | 271 | 119 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.070 | 271 | 88 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.432 | 271 | 86 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.879 | 271 | 90 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.082 | 271 | 134 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.386 | 271 | 106 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.406 | 271 | 111 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.455 | 271 | 105 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.275 | 271 | 102 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.968 | 271 | 91 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.152 | 271 | 52 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.571 | 271 | 125 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.478 | 271 | 131 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.170 | 271 | 110 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.100 | 271 | 97 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.070 | 271 | 112 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 72.900 | 271 | 33 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
ULM defence
| ULM defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.308 | 295 | 135 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.508 | 295 | 137 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.215 | 295 | 66 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.314 | 295 | 136 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.522 | 295 | 138 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.077 | 295 | 115 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.339 | 295 | 118 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.500 | 295 | 130 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.413 | 295 | 34 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.536 | 295 | 133 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.427 | 295 | 136 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.418 | 295 | 130 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.161 | 295 | 32 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.778 | 295 | 102 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.448 | 295 | 125 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.115 | 295 | 8 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.064 | 295 | 8 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.051 | 295 | 42 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 70.600 | 295 | 41 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs