The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
LIB
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 66.5 |
| Drives per game | 11.5 |
| SP+ | 2.5 (62nd, offence 63rd, defence 54th) |
| Returning production | 38% (pass 75%, rush 45%, receiving 21%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | LIB |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 39%125th |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 30%130th |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 30%128th |
| no-huddle share | — | 77%50th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 62%76th |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 38%72nd |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 30.827th |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
LIB offence
| LIB offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.124 | 266 | 82 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.462 | 266 | 50 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.131 | 266 | 115 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.001 | 266 | 113 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.475 | 266 | 42 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.689 | 266 | 133 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.381 | 266 | 36 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.449 | 266 | 62 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.921 | 266 | 8 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.487 | 266 | 75 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.400 | 266 | 17 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.324 | 266 | 36 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.113 | 266 | 10 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.762 | 266 | 61 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.643 | 266 | 84 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.147 | 266 | 78 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.094 | 266 | 84 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.053 | 266 | 68 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 67.200 | 266 | 118 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
LIB defence
| LIB defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.039 | 245 | 71 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.355 | 245 | 37 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.386 | 245 | 123 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.147 | 245 | 114 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.398 | 245 | 66 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.084 | 245 | 117 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.039 | 245 | 41 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.322 | 245 | 16 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.804 | 245 | 122 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.396 | 245 | 25 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.286 | 245 | 77 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.019 | 245 | 97 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.211 | 245 | 89 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.727 | 245 | 76 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.857 | 245 | 39 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.188 | 245 | 110 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.110 | 245 | 90 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.078 | 245 | 110 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 71.900 | 245 | 63 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs