Miami (OH) · away
at
—
Tuesday 2026-11-24 · time TBA · Waldo Stadium
Western Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
WMU pass rush3.0% 66105th5.8% 174128thfaces M-OH4.0% 10148th3.5% ~1.2 sacks
M-OH pass rush3.3% 123103rd4.8% 209137thfaces WMU5.4% 7475th4.3% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

M-OH with the ball

M-OH offence vs WMU defenceM-OH offenceWMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.23943rd0.09986th+43
success rate0.43082nd0.465125th+43
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42612th1.02510th-2
rush: points added per play0.017111th0.02266th-45
rush: success rate0.389111th0.450108th-3
rush: explosiveness0.87792nd0.72018th-74
pass: points added per play0.6196th0.17381st+75
pass: success rate0.48737th0.464115th+78
pass: explosiveness1.86711th1.44042nd+31
standard downs: success rate0.48874th0.47791st+17
passing downs: success rate0.30183rd0.432137th+54
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.871100th3.051103rd+3
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212116th0.17241st-75
short-yardage conversion rate0.667104th0.72070th-34
points per trip inside the 403.90970th3.65089th+19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14979th0.1084th-75
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111115th0.0563rd-112
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03824th0.05245th+21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.00063rd——

WMU with the ball

WMU offence vs M-OH defenceWMU offenceM-OH defencerank gap
points added per play0.09397th0.179116th+19
success rate0.400108th0.450115th+7
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.16799th1.316102nd+3
rush: points added per play0.14763rd0.06583rd+20
rush: success rate0.41397th0.42586th-11
rush: explosiveness0.97964th0.98591st+27
pass: points added per play-0.006126th0.372123rd-3
pass: success rate0.380111th0.483125th+14
pass: explosiveness1.426106th1.52962nd-44
standard downs: success rate0.450108th0.509117th+9
passing downs: success rate0.30675th0.341116th+41
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.870101st2.86069th-32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16767th0.21798th+31
short-yardage conversion rate0.73778th0.778101st+23
points per trip inside the 404.36442nd4.700129th+87
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13149th0.1042nd-47
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09486th0.0659th-77
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03723rd0.03813th-10
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60092nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.