The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| TOL pass rush | 7.1% 9937th | 6.9% 218110th | faces WMU | 5.4% 7475th | 6.2% ~2.1 sacks |
| WMU pass rush | 3.0% 66105th | 5.8% 174128th | faces TOL | 2.1% 9612th | 2.6% ~0.8 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
WMU with the ball
| WMU offence vs TOL defence | WMU offence | TOL defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.09397th | -0.02339th | -58 |
| success rate | 0.400108th | 0.32515th | -93 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.16799th | 1.30295th | -4 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.14763rd | -0.09529th | -34 |
| rush: success rate | 0.41397th | 0.2839th | -88 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.97964th | 0.95882nd | +18 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.006126th | 0.17079th | -47 |
| pass: success rate | 0.380111th | 0.39169th | -42 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.426106th | 1.58082nd | -24 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.450108th | 0.38619th | -89 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.30675th | 0.21016th | -59 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.870101st | 2.62146th | -55 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16767th | 0.20785th | +18 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.73778th | 0.3893rd | -75 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.36442nd | 2.87541st | -1 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.13149th | 0.13531st | -18 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.09486th | 0.07324th | -62 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.03723rd | 0.06272nd | +49 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.60092nd | — | — |
TOL with the ball
| TOL offence vs WMU defence | TOL offence | WMU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.26934th | 0.09986th | +52 |
| success rate | 0.44762nd | 0.465125th | +63 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.5271st | 1.02510th | +9 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.10675th | 0.02266th | -9 |
| rush: success rate | 0.41596th | 0.450108th | +12 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.06730th | 0.72018th | -12 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.44024th | 0.17381st | +57 |
| pass: success rate | 0.48440th | 0.464115th | +75 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.9357th | 1.44042nd | +35 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.49763rd | 0.47791st | +28 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.32959th | 0.432137th | +78 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.07774th | 3.051103rd | +29 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.17075th | 0.17241st | -34 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.667106th | 0.72070th | -36 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.55237th | 3.65089th | +52 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.13662nd | 0.1084th | -58 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.07238th | 0.0563rd | -35 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06497th | 0.05245th | -52 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 68.300106th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.