Eastern Michigan · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 15:30 · InfoCision Stadium
Akron · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
AKR pass rush0.0% 95138th5.2% 192134thfaces EMU4.3% 14154th2.1% ~0.7 sacks
EMU pass rush2.0% 149123rd7.1% 269106thfaces AKR7.6% 105105th4.8% ~1.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

EMU with the ball

EMU offence vs AKR defenceEMU offenceAKR defencerank gap
points added per play-0.016124th0.241129th+5
success rate0.371122nd0.43198th-24
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143110th1.372115th+5
rush: points added per play0.036102nd0.04576th-26
rush: success rate0.394109th0.436101st-8
rush: explosiveness0.95674th0.87855th-19
pass: points added per play0.058112th0.494136th+24
pass: success rate0.362121st0.41990th-31
pass: explosiveness1.310126th1.910134th+8
standard downs: success rate0.436121st0.48294th-27
passing downs: success rate0.236123rd0.316102nd-21
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.89598th2.89173rd-25
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16868th0.18857th-11
short-yardage conversion rate0.80037th0.68855th+18
points per trip inside the 403.179114th3.79299th-15
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.172112th0.15050th-62
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09894th0.08137th-57
havoc allowed by the secondary0.074116th0.06991st-25
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.80010th——

AKR with the ball

AKR offence vs EMU defenceAKR offenceEMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.020117th0.11290th-27
success rate0.44366th0.41084th+18
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.981137th1.25384th-53
rush: points added per play0.09979th0.06482nd+3
rush: success rate0.51319th0.40672nd+53
rush: explosiveness0.709129th1.040105th-24
pass: points added per play0.027117th0.20487th-30
pass: success rate0.41092nd0.42696th+4
pass: explosiveness1.262134th1.45550th-84
standard downs: success rate0.50059th0.48496th+37
passing downs: success rate0.30874th0.26555th-19
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.61912th2.97092nd+80
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13023rd0.18755th+32
short-yardage conversion rate0.81827th0.69657th+30
points per trip inside the 403.95069th3.40672nd+3
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.198131st0.17991st-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.122126th0.09561st-65
havoc allowed by the secondary0.076119th0.084122nd+3
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.4004th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.