Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.
What actually happens around a number like this
Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). KENT wins about 59% of the time at a number like ours.
OHIO
Games
4
Plays per game
66.2
Drives per game
10.2
SP+
-10.5 (109th, offence 105th, defence 101st)
Returning production
63% (pass 94%, rush 100%, receiving 17%)
KENT
Games
4
Plays per game
61.5
Drives per game
11.5
SP+
-22.4 (130th, offence 132nd, defence 122nd)
Returning production
64% (pass 103%, rush 76%, receiving 45%)
What each side chooses to do
Offence
OHIO
KENT
pass rate, all downs
43%105th
42%113th
pass rate, standard downs
39%93rd
34%117th
pass rate, 1st down
41%84th
27%133rd
no-huddle share
89%23rd
58%74th
pass rate, red zone
33%95th
33%90th
pass rate, passing downs
53%118th
54%115th
seconds per play (own drives)
30.437th
31.616th
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
OHIO offence
OHIO offence
value
plays
FBS rank
points added per play
0.223
265
53 of 138
success rate
0.442
265
69 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)
1.257
265
57 of 138
rush: points added per play
0.286
265
16 of 138
rush: success rate
0.463
265
57 of 138
rush: explosiveness
1.053
265
36 of 138
pass: points added per play
0.104
265
107 of 138
pass: success rate
0.396
265
100 of 138
pass: explosiveness
1.555
265
69 of 138
standard downs: success rate
0.516
265
47 of 138
passing downs: success rate
0.272
265
104 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)
3.566
265
14 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line
0.101
265
8 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate
0.864
265
12 of 138
points per trip inside the 40
4.280
265
51 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)
0.137
265
63 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven
0.070
265
31 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary
0.067
265
103 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)
69.700
265
88 of 138
KENT offence
KENT offence
value
plays
FBS rank
points added per play
-0.028
246
126 of 138
success rate
0.313
246
137 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)
1.368
246
22 of 138
rush: points added per play
-0.079
246
129 of 138
rush: success rate
0.331
246
135 of 138
rush: explosiveness
0.972
246
67 of 138
pass: points added per play
0.126
246
100 of 138
pass: success rate
0.296
246
135 of 138
pass: explosiveness
1.978
246
5 of 138
standard downs: success rate
0.372
246
136 of 138
passing downs: success rate
0.224
246
129 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)
2.778
246
113 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line
0.223
246
123 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate
0.615
246
118 of 138
points per trip inside the 40
2.895
246
125 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)
0.163
246
98 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven
0.085
246
63 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary
0.077
246
121 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)
74.600
246
12 of 138
OHIO defence
OHIO defence
value
plays
FBS rank
points added per play
0.276
257
131 of 138
success rate
0.432
257
100 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)
1.381
257
121 of 138
rush: points added per play
0.147
257
115 of 138
rush: success rate
0.405
257
71 of 138
rush: explosiveness
1.088
257
118 of 138
pass: points added per play
0.490
257
135 of 138
pass: success rate
0.480
257
123 of 138
pass: explosiveness
1.774
257
118 of 138
standard downs: success rate
0.440
257
60 of 138
passing downs: success rate
0.413
257
134 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)
2.833
257
67 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line
0.209
257
88 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate
0.762
257
91 of 138
points per trip inside the 40
5.350
257
138 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)
0.158
257
63 of 138
havoc created by the front seven
0.112
257
93 of 138
havoc created by the secondary
0.046
257
33 of 138
opponent average starting field position
71.600
257
60 of 138
KENT defence
KENT defence
value
plays
FBS rank
points added per play
0.201
249
121 of 138
success rate
0.474
249
133 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)
1.272
249
89 of 138
rush: points added per play
0.133
249
109 of 138
rush: success rate
0.434
249
98 of 138
rush: explosiveness
0.890
249
61 of 138
pass: points added per play
0.312
249
115 of 138
pass: success rate
0.517
249
135 of 138
pass: explosiveness
1.555
249
71 of 138
standard downs: success rate
0.556
249
137 of 138
passing downs: success rate
0.261
249
49 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)
3.189
249
113 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line
0.156
249
28 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate
0.842
249
120 of 138
points per trip inside the 40
5.261
249
137 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)
0.141
249
39 of 138
havoc created by the front seven
0.100
249
72 of 138
havoc created by the secondary
0.040
249
17 of 138
opponent average starting field position
70.100
249
36 of 138
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs