The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
CMU
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 57.0 |
| Drives per game | 10.2 |
| SP+ | -18.7 (129th, offence 136th, defence 100th) |
| Returning production | 54% (pass 9%, rush 123%, receiving 65%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | CMU |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 35%133rd |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 25%133rd |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 32%121st |
| no-huddle share | — | 2%137th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 56%107th |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 20%129th |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 32.69th |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
CMU offence
| CMU offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.000 | 228 | 123 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.351 | 228 | 129 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.196 | 228 | 87 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.135 | 228 | 68 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.401 | 228 | 102 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.107 | 228 | 22 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.180 | 228 | 137 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.263 | 228 | 138 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.423 | 228 | 107 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.395 | 228 | 131 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.254 | 228 | 112 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.181 | 228 | 63 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.129 | 228 | 22 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.826 | 228 | 25 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.000 | 228 | 119 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.162 | 228 | 94 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.096 | 228 | 87 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.066 | 228 | 99 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 71.400 | 228 | 51 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
CMU defence
| CMU defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.166 | 264 | 114 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.473 | 264 | 132 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.118 | 264 | 29 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.118 | 264 | 104 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.496 | 264 | 133 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.862 | 264 | 43 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.153 | 264 | 75 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.434 | 264 | 102 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.329 | 264 | 17 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.522 | 264 | 126 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.366 | 264 | 126 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.534 | 264 | 137 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.135 | 264 | 14 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.933 | 264 | 136 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.393 | 264 | 70 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.144 | 264 | 42 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.068 | 264 | 14 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.076 | 264 | 107 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 68.300 | 264 | 19 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs