The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
UNM
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 66.0 |
| Drives per game | 12.0 |
| SP+ | 7.7 (46th, offence 61st, defence 29th) |
| Returning production | 58% (pass 74%, rush 71%, receiving 43%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | UNM |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 35%132nd |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 30%129th |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 35%114th |
| no-huddle share | — | 22%108th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 46%133rd |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 19%130th |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 33.82nd |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
UNM offence
| UNM offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.163 | 264 | 67 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.417 | 264 | 96 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.235 | 264 | 66 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.264 | 264 | 19 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.462 | 264 | 59 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.126 | 264 | 18 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.021 | 264 | 129 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.337 | 264 | 129 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.542 | 264 | 71 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.473 | 264 | 90 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.287 | 264 | 94 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.285 | 264 | 44 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.140 | 264 | 38 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.889 | 264 | 8 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.273 | 264 | 52 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.117 | 264 | 34 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.087 | 264 | 69 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.030 | 264 | 14 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 59.600 | 264 | 138 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
UNM defence
| UNM defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.146 | 237 | 7 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.321 | 237 | 13 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.374 | 237 | 116 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | -0.145 | 237 | 18 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.307 | 237 | 13 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.926 | 237 | 74 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.086 | 237 | 58 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.351 | 237 | 28 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.828 | 237 | 126 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.368 | 237 | 12 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.247 | 237 | 36 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 1.917 | 237 | 3 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.246 | 237 | 119 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.500 | 237 | 8 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.583 | 237 | 21 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.249 | 237 | 137 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.169 | 237 | 133 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.080 | 237 | 116 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 77.400 | 237 | 135 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs