Nevada · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 19:00 · Sun Bowl
UTEP · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UTEP pass rush1.2% 83133rd6.0% 183124thfaces NEV5.3% 7574th3.3% ~1.1 sacks
NEV pass rush4.7% 8578th5.2% 230133rdfaces UTEP21.1% 71137th12.9% ~4.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

NEV with the ball

NEV offence vs UTEP defenceNEV offenceUTEP defencerank gap
points added per play0.09396th0.252130th+34
success rate0.41499th0.472131st+32
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29544th1.20963rd+19
rush: points added per play0.21835th0.136112th+77
rush: success rate0.49331st0.439104th+73
rush: explosiveness1.08923rd0.92271st+48
pass: points added per play-0.015128th0.512137th+9
pass: success rate0.324133rd0.528138th+5
pass: explosiveness1.69135th1.57178th+43
standard downs: success rate0.46695th0.508116th+21
passing downs: success rate0.30576th0.369129th+53
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23652nd2.96991st+39
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.197100th0.223105th+5
short-yardage conversion rate0.640112th0.66752nd-60
points per trip inside the 404.04562nd4.500128th+66
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12947th0.12617th-30
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07442nd0.09459th+17
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05574th0.0314th-70
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30028th——

UTEP with the ball

UTEP offence vs NEV defenceUTEP offenceNEV defencerank gap
points added per play-0.179138th0.149100th-38
success rate0.367124th0.42190th-34
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092127th1.12031st-96
rush: points added per play-0.197136th0.125108th-28
rush: success rate0.357128th0.438103rd-25
rush: explosiveness0.86795th0.87452nd-43
pass: points added per play-0.037131st0.271102nd-29
pass: success rate0.40297th0.42293rd-4
pass: explosiveness1.371118th1.53564th-54
standard downs: success rate0.442115th0.47489th-26
passing downs: success rate0.200135th0.30591st-44
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.516133rd3.272120th-13
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.240131st0.14622nd-109
short-yardage conversion rate0.500135th0.62533rd-102
points per trip inside the 401.700136th3.24061st-75
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.217137th0.1127th-130
havoc allowed by the front seven0.173137th0.0636th-131
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04448th0.04939th-9
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.800100th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.