San José State · away
at
Final SJSU 27 – 21 EMU
Friday 2026-09-04 18:30 · Rynearson Stadium
Eastern Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
EMU pass rush2.0% 149123rd7.1% 269106thfaces SJSU5.1% 11768th3.6% ~1.2 sacks
SJSU pass rush2.7% 111114th7.5% 21294thfaces EMU4.3% 14154th3.5% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

SJSU with the ball

SJSU offence vs EMU defenceSJSU offenceEMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.082100th0.11290th-10
success rate0.396111th0.41084th-27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22469th1.25384th+15
rush: points added per play-0.014118th0.06482nd-36
rush: success rate0.364124th0.40672nd-52
rush: explosiveness0.96471st1.040105th+34
pass: points added per play0.24071st0.20487th+16
pass: success rate0.42978th0.42696th+18
pass: explosiveness1.447102nd1.45550th-52
standard downs: success rate0.46298th0.48496th-2
passing downs: success rate0.273103rd0.26555th-48
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18261st2.97092nd+31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18691st0.18755th-36
short-yardage conversion rate0.571124th0.69657th-67
points per trip inside the 403.360104th3.40672nd-32
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15282nd0.17991st+9
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08565th0.09561st-4
havoc allowed by the secondary0.067104th0.084122nd+18
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.30045th——

EMU with the ball

EMU offence vs SJSU defenceEMU offenceSJSU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.016124th0.06675th-49
success rate0.371122nd0.436104th-18
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143110th1.07019th-91
rush: points added per play0.036102nd0.10696th-6
rush: success rate0.394109th0.476126th+17
rush: explosiveness0.95674th0.87654th-20
pass: points added per play0.058112th0.13171st-41
pass: success rate0.362121st0.41889th-32
pass: explosiveness1.310126th1.2788th-118
standard downs: success rate0.436121st0.510120th-1
passing downs: success rate0.236123rd0.27057th-66
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.89598th2.93186th-12
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16868th0.16937th-31
short-yardage conversion rate0.80037th0.833115th+78
points per trip inside the 403.179114th3.43374th-40
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.172112th0.13634th-78
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09894th0.07018th-76
havoc allowed by the secondary0.074116th0.06688th-28
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.80010th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.