Western Kentucky · away
at
Final WKU 14 – 49 NEV
Saturday 2026-09-05 22:30 · Mackay Stadium
Nevada · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
NEV pass rush4.7% 8578th5.2% 230133rdfaces WKU3.7% 10944th4.2% ~1.4 sacks
WKU pass rush3.0% 67106th7.8% 17990thfaces NEV5.3% 7574th4.2% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WKU with the ball

WKU offence vs NEV defenceWKU offenceNEV defencerank gap
points added per play0.006121st0.149100th-21
success rate0.375121st0.42190th-31
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.26156th1.12031st-25
rush: points added per play-0.105133rd0.125108th-25
rush: success rate0.406100th0.438103rd+3
rush: explosiveness0.720128th0.87452nd-76
pass: points added per play0.125101st0.271102nd+1
pass: success rate0.359124th0.42293rd-31
pass: explosiveness1.85613th1.53564th+51
standard downs: success rate0.433122nd0.47489th-33
passing downs: success rate0.276100th0.30591st-9
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.695120th3.272120th0
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.239130th0.14622nd-108
short-yardage conversion rate0.71492nd0.62533rd-59
points per trip inside the 403.66783rd3.24061st-22
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15485th0.1127th-78
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119125th0.0636th-119
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03521st0.04939th+18
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50070th——

NEV with the ball

NEV offence vs WKU defenceNEV offenceWKU defencerank gap
points added per play0.09396th0.303134th+38
success rate0.41499th0.446114th+15
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29544th1.460134th+90
rush: points added per play0.21835th0.341137th+102
rush: success rate0.49331st0.464121st+90
rush: explosiveness1.08923rd1.232134th+111
pass: points added per play-0.015128th0.24295th-33
pass: success rate0.324133rd0.429100th-33
pass: explosiveness1.69135th1.727116th+81
standard downs: success rate0.46695th0.495108th+13
passing downs: success rate0.30576th0.329112th+36
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23652nd3.504136th+84
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.197100th0.14520th-80
short-yardage conversion rate0.640112th0.850123rd+11
points per trip inside the 404.04562nd4.962131st+69
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12947th0.12823rd-24
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07442nd0.07427th-15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05574th0.05450th-24
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30028th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.