The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| UNT pass rush | 4.1% 7388th | 5.9% 185125th | faces UAB | 10.6% 104132nd | 7.3% ~2.4 sacks |
| UAB pass rush | 10.4% 779th | 7.8% 24389th | faces UNT | 1.7% 1168th | 6.1% ~2.0 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
UAB with the ball
| UAB offence vs UNT defence | UAB offence | UNT defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.050108th | 0.11992nd | -16 |
| success rate | 0.42388th | 0.445113th | +25 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.18592nd | 1.22669th | -23 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.13569th | -0.04340th | -29 |
| rush: success rate | 0.43782nd | 0.41277th | -5 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.99458th | 0.72419th | -39 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.009127th | 0.453130th | +3 |
| pass: success rate | 0.41391st | 0.505131st | +40 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.45598th | 1.846129th | +31 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.441117th | 0.48193rd | -24 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.38025th | 0.352122nd | +97 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.13767th | 2.48329th | -38 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.15958th | 0.19674th | +16 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.73975th | 0.70461st | -14 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.889126th | 3.875107th | -19 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.15892nd | 0.15051st | -41 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.106108th | 0.10682nd | -26 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.05370th | 0.04325th | -45 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.60091st | — | — |
UNT with the ball
| UNT offence vs UAB defence | UNT offence | UAB defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.31917th | 0.05373rd | +56 |
| success rate | 0.50520th | 0.450116th | +96 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.28048th | 1.04414th | -34 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.18841st | 0.09393rd | +52 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44673rd | 0.473125th | +52 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.05833rd | 0.94278th | +45 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.46721st | -0.01129th | +8 |
| pass: success rate | 0.5728th | 0.40372nd | +64 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.46194th | 1.2757th | -87 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.55820th | 0.531130th | +110 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37628th | 0.25042nd | +14 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.27146th | 3.430132nd | +86 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16564th | 0.1249th | -55 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75069th | 0.70462nd | -7 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.41938th | 3.870106th | +68 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.11328th | 0.15761st | +33 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.06929th | 0.120109th | +80 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04552nd | 0.03610th | -42 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.10077th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.