The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| TULN pass rush | 4.1% 12289th | 7.3% 275100th | faces UNT | 1.7% 1168th | 2.9% ~1.0 sacks |
| UNT pass rush | 4.1% 7388th | 5.9% 185125th | faces TULN | 8.6% 116118th | 6.4% ~2.1 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
UNT with the ball
| UNT offence vs TULN defence | UNT offence | TULN defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.31917th | 0.171115th | +98 |
| success rate | 0.50520th | 0.39672nd | +52 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.28048th | 1.30697th | +49 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.18841st | 0.112101st | +60 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44673rd | 0.37048th | -25 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.05833rd | 1.074112th | +79 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.46721st | 0.300110th | +89 |
| pass: success rate | 0.5728th | 0.443107th | +99 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.46194th | 1.54669th | -25 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.55820th | 0.44162nd | +42 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37628th | 0.317104th | +76 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.27146th | 3.086106th | +60 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16564th | 0.16233rd | -31 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75069th | 0.76997th | +28 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.41938th | 3.30865th | +27 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.11328th | 0.1106th | -22 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.06929th | 0.06711th | -18 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04552nd | 0.04224th | -28 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.10077th | — | — |
TULN with the ball
| TULN offence vs UNT defence | TULN offence | UNT defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.10392nd | 0.11992nd | 0 |
| success rate | 0.343131st | 0.445113th | -18 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.5133rd | 1.22669th | +66 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.16151st | -0.04340th | -11 |
| rush: success rate | 0.379118th | 0.41277th | -41 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.3461st | 0.72419th | +18 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.020120th | 0.453130th | +10 |
| pass: success rate | 0.304134th | 0.505131st | -3 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.70334th | 1.846129th | +95 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.408128th | 0.48193rd | -35 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.237122nd | 0.352122nd | 0 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.573129th | 2.48329th | -100 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.218120th | 0.19674th | -46 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75072nd | 0.70461st | -11 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.474132nd | 3.875107th | -25 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.200133rd | 0.15051st | -82 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.135133rd | 0.10682nd | -51 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06598th | 0.04325th | -73 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 75.1006th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.