Rice · away
at
—
Thursday 2026-11-19 19:30 · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TEM pass rush1.2% 84134th4.0% 202138thfaces RICE6.0% 5088th3.6% ~1.2 sacks
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces TEM4.4% 6858th2.8% ~0.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs TEM defenceRICE offenceTEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd0.209123rd+21
success rate0.44761st0.457121st+60
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.20259th-62
rush: points added per play0.12770th0.155118th+48
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.455111th+78
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd0.88458th-4
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd0.306113th-20
pass: success rate0.333130th0.474121st-9
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.57680th+33
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.497111th+70
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.347120th0
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd2.88372nd+39
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.1104th-24
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.76996th+57
points per trip inside the 403.83374th3.58683rd+9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.1095th-59
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.0522nd-109
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.05659th+50
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

TEM with the ball

TEM offence vs RICE defenceTEM offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.23746th0.13798th+52
success rate0.43578th0.42997th+19
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30141st1.28992nd+51
rush: points added per play0.25623rd0.152117th+94
rush: success rate0.46160th0.42688th+28
rush: explosiveness1.06032nd1.141126th+94
pass: points added per play0.20579th0.15074th-5
pass: success rate0.384108th0.442105th-3
pass: explosiveness1.83415th1.49759th+44
standard downs: success rate0.47589th0.489101st+12
passing downs: success rate0.33356th0.31097th+41
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32835th2.76661st+26
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16974th0.18452nd-22
short-yardage conversion rate0.72783rd0.64740th-43
points per trip inside the 403.381103rd4.280122nd+19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0897th0.14644th+37
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04911th0.10786th+75
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04136th0.03814th-22
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10016th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.