UAB · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TEM pass rush1.2% 84134th4.0% 202138thfaces UAB10.6% 104132nd5.9% ~1.9 sacks
UAB pass rush10.4% 779th7.8% 24389thfaces TEM4.4% 6858th7.4% ~2.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UAB with the ball

UAB offence vs TEM defenceUAB offenceTEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.050108th0.209123rd+15
success rate0.42388th0.457121st+33
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18592nd1.20259th-33
rush: points added per play0.13569th0.155118th+49
rush: success rate0.43782nd0.455111th+29
rush: explosiveness0.99458th0.88458th0
pass: points added per play-0.009127th0.306113th-14
pass: success rate0.41391st0.474121st+30
pass: explosiveness1.45598th1.57680th-18
standard downs: success rate0.441117th0.497111th-6
passing downs: success rate0.38025th0.347120th+95
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13767th2.88372nd+5
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15958th0.1104th-54
short-yardage conversion rate0.73975th0.76996th+21
points per trip inside the 402.889126th3.58683rd-43
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15892nd0.1095th-87
havoc allowed by the front seven0.106108th0.0522nd-106
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05370th0.05659th-11
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60091st——

TEM with the ball

TEM offence vs UAB defenceTEM offenceUAB defencerank gap
points added per play0.23746th0.05373rd+27
success rate0.43578th0.450116th+38
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30141st1.04414th-27
rush: points added per play0.25623rd0.09393rd+70
rush: success rate0.46160th0.473125th+65
rush: explosiveness1.06032nd0.94278th+46
pass: points added per play0.20579th-0.01129th-50
pass: success rate0.384108th0.40372nd-36
pass: explosiveness1.83415th1.2757th-8
standard downs: success rate0.47589th0.531130th+41
passing downs: success rate0.33356th0.25042nd-14
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32835th3.430132nd+97
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16974th0.1249th-65
short-yardage conversion rate0.72783rd0.70462nd-21
points per trip inside the 403.381103rd3.870106th+3
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0897th0.15761st+54
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04911th0.120109th+98
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04136th0.03610th-26
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10016th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.