The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| UAB pass rush | 10.4% 779th | 7.8% 24389th | faces CLT | 3.2% 9334th | 6.8% ~2.2 sacks |
| CLT pass rush | 3.7% 10994th | 11.5% 20921st | faces UAB | 10.6% 104132nd | 7.1% ~2.4 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
CLT with the ball
| CLT offence vs UAB defence | CLT offence | UAB defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.095134th | 0.05373rd | -61 |
| success rate | 0.362126th | 0.450116th | -10 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.060132nd | 1.04414th | -118 |
| rush: points added per play | -0.155135th | 0.09393rd | -42 |
| rush: success rate | 0.365123rd | 0.473125th | +2 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.760125th | 0.94278th | -47 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.024118th | -0.01129th | -89 |
| pass: success rate | 0.376112th | 0.40372nd | -40 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.288128th | 1.2757th | -121 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.444112th | 0.531130th | +18 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.205133rd | 0.25042nd | -91 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.384137th | 3.430132nd | -5 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.279137th | 0.1249th | -128 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.571123rd | 0.70462nd | -61 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.312133rd | 3.870106th | -27 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.173114th | 0.15761st | -53 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.103103rd | 0.120109th | +6 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.070110th | 0.03610th | -100 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 73.90017th | — | — |
UAB with the ball
| UAB offence vs CLT defence | UAB offence | CLT defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.050108th | 0.165113th | +5 |
| success rate | 0.42388th | 0.472129th | +41 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.18592nd | 1.18150th | -42 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.13569th | 0.09794th | +25 |
| rush: success rate | 0.43782nd | 0.43394th | +12 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.99458th | 1.102119th | +61 |
| pass: points added per play | -0.009127th | 0.343120th | -7 |
| pass: success rate | 0.41391st | 0.520137th | +46 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.45598th | 1.29412th | -86 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.441117th | 0.48295th | -22 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.38025th | 0.449138th | +113 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.13767th | 2.79363rd | -4 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.15958th | 0.247120th | +62 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.73975th | 0.800107th | +32 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 2.889126th | 4.037113th | -13 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.15892nd | 0.13736th | -56 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.106108th | 0.10680th | -28 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.05370th | 0.0325th | -65 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.60091st | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.