South Florida · away
at
—
Friday 2026-11-06 19:30 · Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium
East Carolina · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ECU pass rush3.7% 8193rd12.0% 20919thfaces USF7.9% 63108th5.8% ~1.9 sacks
USF pass rush5.4% 9361st11.7% 19620thfaces ECU7.3% 8299th6.3% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

USF with the ball

USF offence vs ECU defenceUSF offenceECU defencerank gap
points added per play0.23449th-0.01842nd-7
success rate0.51514th0.35435th+21
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.149108th1.313101st-7
rush: points added per play0.25821st0.02467th+46
rush: success rate0.52313th0.37047th+34
rush: explosiveness1.08824th1.183131st+107
pass: points added per play0.25669th-0.00231st-38
pass: success rate0.51025th0.34525th0
pass: explosiveness1.271133rd1.54065th-68
standard downs: success rate0.5778th0.37114th+6
passing downs: success rate0.37132nd0.327109th+77
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.08772nd2.25211th-61
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.200102nd0.291134th+32
short-yardage conversion rate0.83323rd0.58320th-3
points per trip inside the 405.13610th2.84637th+27
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13358th0.194113th+55
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09995th0.160131st+36
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03418th0.0359th-9
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400115th——

ECU with the ball

ECU offence vs USF defenceECU offenceUSF defencerank gap
points added per play0.056106th-0.02040th-66
success rate0.401105th0.40882nd-23
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.166100th0.9553rd-97
rush: points added per play-0.067124th-0.19811th-113
rush: success rate0.368121st0.39764th-57
rush: explosiveness0.836105th0.4986th-99
pass: points added per play0.21076th0.18684th+8
pass: success rate0.42482nd0.433101st+19
pass: explosiveness1.49785th1.44546th-39
standard downs: success rate0.49171st0.494104th+33
passing downs: success rate0.200134th0.23332nd-102
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431136th2.43426th-110
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19798th0.272132nd+34
short-yardage conversion rate0.72781st0.60026th-55
points per trip inside the 403.238110th3.12555th-55
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.182124th0.183102nd-22
havoc allowed by the front seven0.116120th0.141125th+5
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066100th0.04223rd-77
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.40025th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.