UTSA · away
at
—
Thursday 2026-11-05 20:00 · FAU Stadium
Florida Atlantic · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
FAU pass rush4.8% 12677th8.6% 25573rdfaces UTSA2.0% 9811th3.4% ~1.1 sacks
UTSA pass rush1.8% 111128th5.9% 236126thfaces FAU4.1% 17152nd2.9% ~1.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UTSA with the ball

UTSA offence vs FAU defenceUTSA offenceFAU defencerank gap
points added per play0.26835th0.209122nd+87
success rate0.47445th0.40578th+33
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.111124th1.543136th+12
rush: points added per play0.24825th0.171120th+95
rush: success rate0.5419th0.38958th+49
rush: explosiveness0.834106th1.172130th+24
pass: points added per play0.29457th0.288109th+52
pass: success rate0.41787th0.42797th+10
pass: explosiveness1.45997th1.875132nd+35
standard downs: success rate0.56514th0.46381st+67
passing downs: success rate0.263109th0.28676th-33
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07575th2.80564th-11
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17279th0.19162nd-17
short-yardage conversion rate0.85016th0.857124th+108
points per trip inside the 403.54291st4.227120th+29
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13766th0.15862nd-4
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07135th0.08952nd+17
havoc allowed by the secondary0.067105th0.06993rd-12
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.400104th——

FAU with the ball

FAU offence vs UTSA defenceFAU offenceUTSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.14274th0.07777th+3
success rate0.43674th0.432101st+27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151107th1.13536th-71
rush: points added per play0.05591st0.187124th+33
rush: success rate0.387113th0.460114th+1
rush: explosiveness0.97666th0.91770th+4
pass: points added per play0.23073rd0.08457th-16
pass: success rate0.48242nd0.42394th+52
pass: explosiveness1.287129th1.38026th-103
standard downs: success rate0.46694th0.47388th-6
passing downs: success rate0.36536th0.340114th+78
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.746117th3.280123rd+6
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16766th0.12410th-56
short-yardage conversion rate0.79342nd0.65043rd+1
points per trip inside the 403.96268th3.71493rd+25
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14574th0.12821st-53
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08561st0.06712th-49
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06186th0.06167th-19
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60090th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.