UAB · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · Raymond James Stadium
South Florida · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
USF pass rush5.4% 9361st11.7% 19620thfaces UAB10.6% 104132nd8.0% ~2.6 sacks
UAB pass rush10.4% 779th7.8% 24389thfaces USF7.9% 63108th9.2% ~3.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UAB with the ball

UAB offence vs USF defenceUAB offenceUSF defencerank gap
points added per play0.050108th-0.02040th-68
success rate0.42388th0.40882nd-6
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18592nd0.9553rd-89
rush: points added per play0.13569th-0.19811th-58
rush: success rate0.43782nd0.39764th-18
rush: explosiveness0.99458th0.4986th-52
pass: points added per play-0.009127th0.18684th-43
pass: success rate0.41391st0.433101st+10
pass: explosiveness1.45598th1.44546th-52
standard downs: success rate0.441117th0.494104th-13
passing downs: success rate0.38025th0.23332nd+7
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13767th2.43426th-41
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15958th0.272132nd+74
short-yardage conversion rate0.73975th0.60026th-49
points per trip inside the 402.889126th3.12555th-71
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15892nd0.183102nd+10
havoc allowed by the front seven0.106108th0.141125th+17
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05370th0.04223rd-47
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60091st——

USF with the ball

USF offence vs UAB defenceUSF offenceUAB defencerank gap
points added per play0.23449th0.05373rd+24
success rate0.51514th0.450116th+102
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.149108th1.04414th-94
rush: points added per play0.25821st0.09393rd+72
rush: success rate0.52313th0.473125th+112
rush: explosiveness1.08824th0.94278th+54
pass: points added per play0.25669th-0.01129th-40
pass: success rate0.51025th0.40372nd+47
pass: explosiveness1.271133rd1.2757th-126
standard downs: success rate0.5778th0.531130th+122
passing downs: success rate0.37132nd0.25042nd+10
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.08772nd3.430132nd+60
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.200102nd0.1249th-93
short-yardage conversion rate0.83323rd0.70462nd+39
points per trip inside the 405.13610th3.870106th+96
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13358th0.15761st+3
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09995th0.120109th+14
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03418th0.03610th-8
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400115th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.