The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| UNT pass rush | 4.1% 7388th | 5.9% 185125th | faces FAU | 4.1% 17152nd | 4.1% ~1.4 sacks |
| FAU pass rush | 4.8% 12677th | 8.6% 25573rd | faces UNT | 1.7% 1168th | 3.2% ~1.1 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
FAU with the ball
| FAU offence vs UNT defence | FAU offence | UNT defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.14274th | 0.11992nd | +18 |
| success rate | 0.43674th | 0.445113th | +39 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.151107th | 1.22669th | -38 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.05591st | -0.04340th | -51 |
| rush: success rate | 0.387113th | 0.41277th | -36 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.97666th | 0.72419th | -47 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.23073rd | 0.453130th | +57 |
| pass: success rate | 0.48242nd | 0.505131st | +89 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.287129th | 1.846129th | 0 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.46694th | 0.48193rd | -1 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.36536th | 0.352122nd | +86 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.746117th | 2.48329th | -88 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16766th | 0.19674th | +8 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.79342nd | 0.70461st | +19 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.96268th | 3.875107th | +39 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.14574th | 0.15051st | -23 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.08561st | 0.10682nd | +21 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06186th | 0.04325th | -61 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.60090th | — | — |
UNT with the ball
| UNT offence vs FAU defence | UNT offence | FAU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.31917th | 0.209122nd | +105 |
| success rate | 0.50520th | 0.40578th | +58 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.28048th | 1.543136th | +88 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.18841st | 0.171120th | +79 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44673rd | 0.38958th | -15 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.05833rd | 1.172130th | +97 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.46721st | 0.288109th | +88 |
| pass: success rate | 0.5728th | 0.42797th | +89 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.46194th | 1.875132nd | +38 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.55820th | 0.46381st | +61 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37628th | 0.28676th | +48 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.27146th | 2.80564th | +18 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16564th | 0.19162nd | -2 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75069th | 0.857124th | +55 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.41938th | 4.227120th | +82 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.11328th | 0.15862nd | +34 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.06929th | 0.08952nd | +23 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04552nd | 0.06993rd | +41 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.10077th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.