Tulsa · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Rice Stadium
Rice · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
RICE pass rush1.1% 88136th7.8% 19391stfaces TLSA6.4% 9489th3.8% ~1.2 sacks
TLSA pass rush5.5% 12759th8.0% 22684thfaces RICE6.0% 5088th5.8% ~1.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TLSA with the ball

TLSA offence vs RICE defenceTLSA offenceRICE defencerank gap
points added per play0.11788th0.13798th+10
success rate0.405101st0.42997th-4
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.142113th1.28992nd-21
rush: points added per play0.22732nd0.152117th+85
rush: success rate0.44771st0.42688th+17
rush: explosiveness1.03542nd1.141126th+84
pass: points added per play0.011121st0.15074th-47
pass: success rate0.361122nd0.442105th-17
pass: explosiveness1.344122nd1.49759th-63
standard downs: success rate0.53239th0.489101st+62
passing downs: success rate0.151138th0.31097th-41
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.29542nd2.76661st+19
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12117th0.18452nd+35
short-yardage conversion rate0.9295th0.64740th+35
points per trip inside the 403.000120th4.280122nd+2
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14069th0.14644th-25
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07033rd0.10786th+53
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070111th0.03814th-97
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50069th——

RICE with the ball

RICE offence vs TLSA defenceRICE offenceTLSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.069102nd-0.07025th-77
success rate0.44761st0.38663rd+2
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118121st1.03511th-110
rush: points added per play0.12770th-0.11824th-46
rush: success rate0.48933rd0.41581st+48
rush: explosiveness0.98662nd0.6099th-53
pass: points added per play-0.059133rd0.06647th-86
pass: success rate0.333130th0.36744th-86
pass: explosiveness1.64847th1.44345th-2
standard downs: success rate0.52741st0.42852nd+11
passing downs: success rate0.239120th0.30593rd-27
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.35333rd2.83868th+35
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13228th0.19266th+38
short-yardage conversion rate0.80039th0.61931st-8
points per trip inside the 403.83374th2.30413th-61
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13764th0.14745th-19
havoc allowed by the front seven0.110111th0.08242nd-69
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0279th0.06585th+76
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.4002nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.