The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| TLSA pass rush | 5.5% 12759th | 8.0% 22684th | faces UNT | 1.7% 1168th | 3.6% ~1.2 sacks |
| UNT pass rush | 4.1% 7388th | 5.9% 185125th | faces TLSA | 6.4% 9489th | 5.2% ~1.7 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
UNT with the ball
| UNT offence vs TLSA defence | UNT offence | TLSA defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.31917th | -0.07025th | +8 |
| success rate | 0.50520th | 0.38663rd | +43 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.28048th | 1.03511th | -37 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.18841st | -0.11824th | -17 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44673rd | 0.41581st | +8 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.05833rd | 0.6099th | -24 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.46721st | 0.06647th | +26 |
| pass: success rate | 0.5728th | 0.36744th | +36 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.46194th | 1.44345th | -49 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.55820th | 0.42852nd | +32 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37628th | 0.30593rd | +65 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.27146th | 2.83868th | +22 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16564th | 0.19266th | +2 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75069th | 0.61931st | -38 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.41938th | 2.30413th | -25 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.11328th | 0.14745th | +17 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.06929th | 0.08242nd | +13 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04552nd | 0.06585th | +33 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.10077th | — | — |
TLSA with the ball
| TLSA offence vs UNT defence | TLSA offence | UNT defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.11788th | 0.11992nd | +4 |
| success rate | 0.405101st | 0.445113th | +12 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.142113th | 1.22669th | -44 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.22732nd | -0.04340th | +8 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44771st | 0.41277th | +6 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.03542nd | 0.72419th | -23 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.011121st | 0.453130th | +9 |
| pass: success rate | 0.361122nd | 0.505131st | +9 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.344122nd | 1.846129th | +7 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.53239th | 0.48193rd | +54 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.151138th | 0.352122nd | -16 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.29542nd | 2.48329th | -13 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.12117th | 0.19674th | +57 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.9295th | 0.70461st | +56 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.000120th | 3.875107th | -13 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.14069th | 0.15051st | -18 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.07033rd | 0.10682nd | +49 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.070111th | 0.04325th | -86 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.50069th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.