UNLV · away
at
Final UNLV 6 – 44 UNT
Saturday 2026-09-12 15:45 · DATCU Stadium
North Texas · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UNT pass rush4.1% 7388th5.9% 185125thfaces UNLV7.9% 127107th6.0% ~2.0 sacks
UNLV pass rush8.3% 13223rd8.9% 25865thfaces UNT1.7% 1168th5.0% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UNLV with the ball

UNLV offence vs UNT defenceUNLV offenceUNT defencerank gap
points added per play0.053107th0.11992nd-15
success rate0.384118th0.445113th-5
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21973rd1.22669th-4
rush: points added per play0.06189th-0.04340th-49
rush: success rate0.397106th0.41277th-29
rush: explosiveness0.90883rd0.72419th-64
pass: points added per play0.13597th0.453130th+33
pass: success rate0.389102nd0.505131st+29
pass: explosiveness1.61053rd1.846129th+76
standard downs: success rate0.456104th0.48193rd-11
passing downs: success rate0.227127th0.352122nd-5
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21956th2.48329th-27
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13025th0.19674th+49
short-yardage conversion rate0.667108th0.70461st-47
points per trip inside the 402.955123rd3.875107th-16
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15791st0.15051st-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09689th0.10682nd-7
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06083rd0.04325th-58
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.60040th——

UNT with the ball

UNT offence vs UNLV defenceUNT offenceUNLV defencerank gap
points added per play0.31917th0.07676th+59
success rate0.50520th0.40476th+56
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.28048th1.15443rd-5
rush: points added per play0.18841st0.124106th+65
rush: success rate0.44673rd0.477127th+54
rush: explosiveness1.05833rd0.74723rd-10
pass: points added per play0.46721st0.11866th+45
pass: success rate0.5728th0.35129th+21
pass: explosiveness1.46194th1.696110th+16
standard downs: success rate0.55820th0.46684th+64
passing downs: success rate0.37628th0.28679th+51
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.27146th3.606138th+92
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16564th0.13313th-51
short-yardage conversion rate0.75069th0.833117th+48
points per trip inside the 404.41938th3.47877th+39
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11328th0.16170th+42
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06929th0.07120th-9
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04552nd0.090128th+76
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.10077th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.