· away
at
Final null 14 – 38 TEM
Saturday 2026-09-05 14:00 · Lincoln Financial Field
Temple · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

Units not built yet.

What actually happens around a number like this

Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.

null

Games—
Plays per game—
Drives per game—
SP+— (, offence , defence )
Returning production— (pass —, rush —, receiving —)

TEM

Games4
Plays per game61.5
Drives per game9.8
SP+-6.1 (92nd, offence 67th, defence 112th)
Returning production37% (pass 0%, rush 23%, receiving 69%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceTEM
pass rate, all downs—36%131st
pass rate, standard downs—31%128th
pass rate, 1st down—29%130th
no-huddle share—64%67th
pass rate, passing downs—52%124th
pass rate, red zone—33%94th
seconds per play (own drives)—30.144th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

null offence

offencevalueplaysFBS rank

TEM offence

TEM offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.23724646 of 138
success rate0.43524678 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30124641 of 138
rush: points added per play0.25624623 of 138
rush: success rate0.46124660 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.06024632 of 138
pass: points added per play0.20524679 of 138
pass: success rate0.384246108 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.83424615 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47524689 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.33324656 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32824635 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16924674 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72724683 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.381246103 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0892467 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04924611 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04124636 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10024616 of 138

null defence

defencevalueplaysFBS rank

TEM defence

TEM defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.209267123 of 138
success rate0.457267121 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20226759 of 138
rush: points added per play0.155267118 of 138
rush: success rate0.455267111 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.88426758 of 138
pass: points added per play0.306267113 of 138
pass: success rate0.474267121 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.57626780 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.497267111 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.347267120 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.88326772 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.1102674 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76926796 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.58626783 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1092675 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0522672 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05626759 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.40026778 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs