Troy · away
at
Final TROY 10 – 21 USU
Saturday 2026-09-26 19:30 · Maverik Stadium
Utah State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
USU pass rush2.3% 131122nd7.0% 228108thfaces TROY3.6% 11043rd3.0% ~1.0 sacks
TROY pass rush5.1% 9969th13.1% 17611thfaces USU8.5% 94116th6.8% ~2.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TROY with the ball

TROY offence vs USU defenceTROY offenceUSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.023116th0.02162nd-54
success rate0.380120th0.40579th-41
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31333rd1.13335th+2
rush: points added per play0.04796th0.00862nd-34
rush: success rate0.395108th0.40873rd-35
rush: explosiveness1.07427th1.00693rd+66
pass: points added per play0.035116th0.04443rd-73
pass: success rate0.367117th0.40473rd-44
pass: explosiveness1.57165th1.2215th-60
standard downs: success rate0.426126th0.46079th-47
passing downs: success rate0.28497th0.29283rd-14
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.673123rd2.60243rd-80
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.238128th0.21697th-31
short-yardage conversion rate0.632116th0.73780th-36
points per trip inside the 402.958121st3.03753rd-68
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.202134th0.13532nd-102
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08975th0.07121st-54
havoc allowed by the secondary0.113138th0.06482nd-56
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80020th——

USU with the ball

USU offence vs TROY defenceUSU offenceTROY defencerank gap
points added per play-0.071132nd0.03669th-63
success rate0.361128th0.37253rd-75
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31532nd1.318104th+72
rush: points added per play-0.103132nd-0.03544th-88
rush: success rate0.358126th0.36645th-81
rush: explosiveness0.85399th1.02398th-1
pass: points added per play-0.032130th0.07555th-75
pass: success rate0.358125th0.37956th-69
pass: explosiveness1.73828th1.50461st+33
standard downs: success rate0.363137th0.44666th-71
passing downs: success rate0.35841st0.23533rd-8
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07477th2.34419th-58
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.208110th0.259127th+17
short-yardage conversion rate0.300138th0.60027th-111
points per trip inside the 401.810135th3.00050th-85
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.183125th0.18298th-27
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09178th0.124113th+35
havoc allowed by the secondary0.091136th0.05862nd-74
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.10097th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.