San Diego State · away
at
Final SDSU 16 – 41 TOL
Saturday 2026-09-26 12:00 · Glass Bowl
Toledo · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TOL pass rush7.1% 9937th6.9% 218110thfaces SDSU7.4% 94101st7.3% ~2.4 sacks
SDSU pass rush6.5% 7744th7.2% 209102ndfaces TOL2.1% 9612th4.3% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

SDSU with the ball

SDSU offence vs TOL defenceSDSU offenceTOL defencerank gap
points added per play-0.085133rd-0.02339th-94
success rate0.347130th0.32515th-115
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143111th1.30295th-16
rush: points added per play-0.034122nd-0.09529th-93
rush: success rate0.350130th0.2839th-121
rush: explosiveness0.86696th0.95882nd-14
pass: points added per play-0.109135th0.17079th-56
pass: success rate0.353127th0.39169th-58
pass: explosiveness1.53573rd1.58082nd+9
standard downs: success rate0.393132nd0.38619th-113
passing downs: success rate0.263108th0.21016th-92
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94094th2.62146th-48
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.203107th0.20785th-22
short-yardage conversion rate0.545131st0.3893rd-128
points per trip inside the 403.43597th2.87541st-56
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.172113th0.13531st-82
havoc allowed by the front seven0.101100th0.07324th-76
havoc allowed by the secondary0.071113th0.06272nd-41
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90032nd——

TOL with the ball

TOL offence vs SDSU defenceTOL offenceSDSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.26934th0.09784th+50
success rate0.44762nd0.442107th+45
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5271st1.04916th+15
rush: points added per play0.10675th-0.00656th-19
rush: success rate0.41596th0.463119th+23
rush: explosiveness1.06730th0.67713th-17
pass: points added per play0.44024th0.24796th+72
pass: success rate0.48440th0.42999th+59
pass: explosiveness1.9357th1.54267th+60
standard downs: success rate0.49763rd0.495106th+43
passing downs: success rate0.32959th0.30592nd+33
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07774th3.393128th+54
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17075th0.1115th-70
short-yardage conversion rate0.667106th0.850122nd+16
points per trip inside the 404.55237th3.40071st+34
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13662nd0.0991st-61
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07238th0.0584th-34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06497th0.04120th-77
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.300106th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.