The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| USU pass rush | 2.3% 131122nd | 7.0% 228108th | faces | — | — |
| pass rush | — | — | faces USU | 8.5% 94116th | — |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
null with the ball
| offence vs USU defence | offence | USU defence | rank gap |
|---|
USU with the ball
| USU offence vs defence | USU offence | defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.071132nd | — | — |
| success rate | 0.361128th | — | — |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.31532nd | — | — |
| rush: points added per play | -0.103132nd | — | — |
| rush: success rate | 0.358126th | — | — |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.85399th | — | — |
| pass: points added per play | -0.032130th | — | — |
| pass: success rate | 0.358125th | — | — |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.73828th | — | — |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.363137th | — | — |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.35841st | — | — |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.07477th | — | — |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.208110th | — | — |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.300138th | — | — |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 1.810135th | — | — |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.183125th | — | — |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.09178th | — | — |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.091136th | — | — |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.10097th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.