The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| WASH pass rush | 7.8% 9026th | 13.7% 1757th | faces IU | 5.5% 7377th | 6.6% ~2.2 sacks |
| IU pass rush | 5.3% 9463rd | 11.2% 17923rd | faces WASH | 8.0% 112109th | 6.7% ~2.2 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
IU with the ball
| IU offence vs WASH defence | IU offence | WASH defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.4215th | -0.1486th | +1 |
| success rate | 0.51018th | 0.34426th | +8 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.38220th | 1.16146th | +26 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.25622nd | -0.2089th | -13 |
| rush: success rate | 0.47443rd | 0.32120th | -23 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.02246th | 0.74122nd | -24 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.6862nd | -0.00330th | +28 |
| pass: success rate | 0.5736th | 0.38561st | +55 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.87710th | 1.55470th | +60 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.55819th | 0.38118th | -1 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37926th | 0.27359th | +33 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.50719th | 2.32317th | -2 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.11813th | 0.305135th | +122 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.72085th | 0.3331st | -84 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 5.2417th | 2.60923rd | +16 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.10922nd | 0.203119th | +97 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.08154th | 0.121111th | +57 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.02811th | 0.082119th | +108 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 66.900121st | — | — |
WASH with the ball
| WASH offence vs IU defence | WASH offence | IU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.15173rd | -0.10717th | -56 |
| success rate | 0.44664th | 0.3003rd | -61 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.20780th | 1.421129th | +49 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.05592nd | -0.13421st | -71 |
| rush: success rate | 0.394110th | 0.2643rd | -107 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.89286th | 1.164128th | +42 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.27265th | -0.03521st | -44 |
| pass: success rate | 0.47647th | 0.35631st | -16 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.391117th | 1.59889th | -28 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.49270th | 0.3292nd | -68 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.30282nd | 0.25041st | -41 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.815110th | 2.26212th | -98 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.221122nd | 0.236112th | -10 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.615119th | 0.5007th | -112 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.86273rd | 2.85738th | -35 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.13254th | 0.198115th | +61 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.08567th | 0.169132nd | +65 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04756th | 0.0303rd | -53 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.40074th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.