Minnesota · away
at
Final MINN 27 – 24 WASH
Saturday 2026-09-26 23:00 · Husky Stadium
Washington · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

MINNWASHbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence4247Offence: points per play — defence4896Offence: success rate — offence6654Offence: success rate — defence6382Offence: explosiveness — offence942Offence: explosiveness — defence5667Run game — offence2334Run game — defence3894Pass game — offence5453Pass game — defence4179Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence320Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence6188Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence4861Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence414

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsmarketMINN by 30WASH by 50

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). WASH wins about 73% of the time at a number like ours.

MINN

Games4
Plays per game66.5
Drives per game11.5
SP+6.5 (52nd, offence 62nd, defence 34th)
Returning production65% (pass 97%, rush 1000%, receiving 45%)

WASH

Games4
Plays per game64.5
Drives per game12.0
SP+12.1 (29th, offence 45th, defence 18th)
Returning production54% (pass 94%, rush 52%, receiving 34%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceMINNWASH
pass rate, all downs55%22nd59%5th
pass rate, standard downs49%15th53%6th
pass rate, 1st down54%8th53%10th
no-huddle share18%114th6%130th
pass rate, passing downs73%27th78%9th
pass rate, red zone66%3rd43%46th
seconds per play (own drives)31.219th28.974th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

MINN offence

MINN offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.12926681 of 138
success rate0.47026647 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092266126 of 138
rush: points added per play0.023266107 of 138
rush: success rate0.47426644 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.747266126 of 138
pass: points added per play0.27326664 of 138
pass: success rate0.47926644 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.355266120 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.56026618 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.233266124 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.498266134 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.241266132 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.640266111 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.50026694 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14326672 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09426685 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04926661 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.600266135 of 138

WASH offence

WASH offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.15125873 of 138
success rate0.44625864 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20725880 of 138
rush: points added per play0.05525892 of 138
rush: success rate0.394258110 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.89225886 of 138
pass: points added per play0.27225865 of 138
pass: success rate0.47625847 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.391258117 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.49225870 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.30225882 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.815258110 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.221258122 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.615258119 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.86225873 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13225854 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08525867 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04725856 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40025874 of 138

MINN defence

MINN defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.04123072 of 138
success rate0.37023052 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20523061 of 138
rush: points added per play0.07423086 of 138
rush: success rate0.38723057 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87023047 of 138
pass: points added per play0.18023082 of 138
pass: success rate0.36923045 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.54323068 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.42023046 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27523062 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.68023054 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.270230131 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.57123017 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.471230127 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.237230133 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.172230135 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06523083 of 138
opponent average starting field position78.800230138 of 138

WASH defence

WASH defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.1482566 of 138
success rate0.34425626 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.16125646 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.2082569 of 138
rush: success rate0.32125620 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.74125622 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.00325630 of 138
pass: success rate0.38525661 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.55425670 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.38125618 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27325659 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.32325617 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.305256135 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.3332561 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.60925623 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.203256119 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.121256111 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.082256119 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.00025650 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs