Eastern Michigan · away
at
Final EMU 10 – 54 WIS
Saturday 2026-09-19 12:30 · Camp Randall Stadium
Wisconsin · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
WIS pass rush3.3% 90101st6.6% 181114thfaces EMU4.3% 14154th3.8% ~1.3 sacks
EMU pass rush2.0% 149123rd7.1% 269106thfaces WIS2.9% 10227th2.5% ~0.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

EMU with the ball

EMU offence vs WIS defenceEMU offenceWIS defencerank gap
points added per play-0.016124th-0.05130th-94
success rate0.371122nd0.34022nd-100
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143110th1.04213th-97
rush: points added per play0.036102nd0.07888th-14
rush: success rate0.394109th0.33830th-79
rush: explosiveness0.95674th0.87251st-23
pass: points added per play0.058112th-0.03024th-88
pass: success rate0.362121st0.37246th-75
pass: explosiveness1.310126th1.1873rd-123
standard downs: success rate0.436121st0.42853rd-68
passing downs: success rate0.236123rd0.1632nd-121
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.89598th2.92885th-13
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16868th0.1051st-67
short-yardage conversion rate0.80037th0.72272nd+35
points per trip inside the 403.179114th3.47475th-39
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.172112th0.16273rd-39
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09894th0.07734th-60
havoc allowed by the secondary0.074116th0.085123rd+7
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.80010th——

WIS with the ball

WIS offence vs EMU defenceWIS offenceEMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.14275th0.11290th+15
success rate0.42389th0.41084th-5
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39119th1.25384th+65
rush: points added per play0.18344th0.06482nd+38
rush: success rate0.368122nd0.40672nd-50
rush: explosiveness1.2416th1.040105th+99
pass: points added per play0.17688th0.20487th-1
pass: success rate0.48836th0.42696th+60
pass: explosiveness1.50781st1.45550th-31
standard downs: success rate0.48282nd0.48496th+14
passing downs: success rate0.30085th0.26555th-30
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94892nd2.97092nd0
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15455th0.18755th0
short-yardage conversion rate0.562127th0.69657th-70
points per trip inside the 403.333106th3.40672nd-34
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16399th0.17991st-8
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08155th0.09561st+6
havoc allowed by the secondary0.081127th0.084122nd-5
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.10098th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.