Western Kentucky · away
at
Final WKU 0 – 38 IU
Saturday 2026-09-19 16:00 · Memorial Stadium (Bloomington, IN)
Indiana · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
IU pass rush5.3% 9463rd11.2% 17923rdfaces WKU3.7% 10944th4.5% ~1.5 sacks
WKU pass rush3.0% 67106th7.8% 17990thfaces IU5.5% 7377th4.2% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WKU with the ball

WKU offence vs IU defenceWKU offenceIU defencerank gap
points added per play0.006121st-0.10717th-104
success rate0.375121st0.3003rd-118
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.26156th1.421129th+73
rush: points added per play-0.105133rd-0.13421st-112
rush: success rate0.406100th0.2643rd-97
rush: explosiveness0.720128th1.164128th0
pass: points added per play0.125101st-0.03521st-80
pass: success rate0.359124th0.35631st-93
pass: explosiveness1.85613th1.59889th+76
standard downs: success rate0.433122nd0.3292nd-120
passing downs: success rate0.276100th0.25041st-59
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.695120th2.26212th-108
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.239130th0.236112th-18
short-yardage conversion rate0.71492nd0.5007th-85
points per trip inside the 403.66783rd2.85738th-45
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15485th0.198115th+30
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119125th0.169132nd+7
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03521st0.0303rd-18
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50070th——

IU with the ball

IU offence vs WKU defenceIU offenceWKU defencerank gap
points added per play0.4215th0.303134th+129
success rate0.51018th0.446114th+96
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.38220th1.460134th+114
rush: points added per play0.25622nd0.341137th+115
rush: success rate0.47443rd0.464121st+78
rush: explosiveness1.02246th1.232134th+88
pass: points added per play0.6862nd0.24295th+93
pass: success rate0.5736th0.429100th+94
pass: explosiveness1.87710th1.727116th+106
standard downs: success rate0.55819th0.495108th+89
passing downs: success rate0.37926th0.329112th+86
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.50719th3.504136th+117
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11813th0.14520th+7
short-yardage conversion rate0.72085th0.850123rd+38
points per trip inside the 405.2417th4.962131st+124
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10922nd0.12823rd+1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08154th0.07427th-27
havoc allowed by the secondary0.02811th0.05450th+39
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.900121st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.