San Diego State · away
at
Final SDSU 10 – 28 UCLA
Saturday 2026-09-12 19:15 · Rose Bowl
UCLA · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UCLA pass rush4.4% 13783rd9.4% 26555thfaces SDSU7.4% 94101st5.9% ~2.0 sacks
SDSU pass rush6.5% 7744th7.2% 209102ndfaces UCLA5.7% 10680th6.1% ~2.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

SDSU with the ball

SDSU offence vs UCLA defenceSDSU offenceUCLA defencerank gap
points added per play-0.085133rd-0.12712th-121
success rate0.347130th0.32716th-114
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143111th1.347110th-1
rush: points added per play-0.034122nd-0.10526th-96
rush: success rate0.350130th0.32826th-104
rush: explosiveness0.86696th0.79928th-68
pass: points added per play-0.109135th-0.11911th-124
pass: success rate0.353127th0.33319th-108
pass: explosiveness1.53573rd1.845128th+55
standard downs: success rate0.393132nd0.38921st-111
passing downs: success rate0.263108th0.22018th-90
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94094th2.36521st-73
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.203107th0.250124th+17
short-yardage conversion rate0.545131st0.833116th-15
points per trip inside the 403.43597th3.00051st-46
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.172113th0.185105th-8
havoc allowed by the front seven0.101100th0.10579th-21
havoc allowed by the secondary0.071113th0.080117th+4
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90032nd——

UCLA with the ball

UCLA offence vs SDSU defenceUCLA offenceSDSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.28727th0.09784th+57
success rate0.49430th0.442107th+77
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25358th1.04916th-42
rush: points added per play0.4072nd-0.00656th+54
rush: success rate0.5735th0.463119th+114
rush: explosiveness1.06431st0.67713th-18
pass: points added per play0.124103rd0.24796th-7
pass: success rate0.394101st0.42999th-2
pass: explosiveness1.66840th1.54267th+27
standard downs: success rate0.55226th0.495106th+80
passing downs: success rate0.34250th0.30592nd+42
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9751st3.393128th+127
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0963rd0.1115th+2
short-yardage conversion rate0.84220th0.850122nd+102
points per trip inside the 404.34345th3.40071st+26
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13253rd0.0991st-52
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05718th0.0584th-14
havoc allowed by the secondary0.075118th0.04120th-98
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.700134th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.